RE: Cops in Japan Run Out of Things to Do as Crime Rate Falls, So They Create New Crimes
The claims you make are baseless. Show me the evidence.
state: $Sum : CostPerHead = NumberOfPolice
pricate: ($Sum - ProfitMargin) : CostPerHead = NumberOfPolice
Now, question: Which NumberOfPolice will be lower?
And FINALLY, policing is already done for profit by the state! Look up civil asset forfeiture and for-profit prisons.
Yes, the caf is bullshit that is misused - but by both state and private forces. In fact I have read that one of the University private forces have a set budget for it and the University is angry if that is not matched.
And For-profit-prisons - thanks, that's a good point for me because after all they are a private corporation adventure.
how many people do private security groups kill and maim vs. run-of-the-mill government cops?
University cops kill several people a day. Japan police, as we have just read, killed one person and surely are a lot more.
QED
All protected by...drumroll please...
THE STATE
The free market destroys such lunatic organizations.
No, you get it wrong. The state is protected by them.
Really, that no-state religion that ignores basics of human life is just strange.
A free market first of all destroys lives and then creates something that is a state.inc
That's a bold claim. I'll wait for your argument in support of it.
Start with reading Charles Dickens.
Then it is your turn to bring an argument that private police is better then state.
You'll have to present an argument, since you made the claim. Would you like to do a formal debate on this with me on my YouTube channel? I'll let you pick the moderator.
http://static.springer.com/sgw/documents/1594178/application/pdf/2014+Gordon+Tullock+Prize+Winner.pdf
I don't do any youtube.
And you were the first making a claim - that private cops are better then state ones. And you ignored the evidence. So... no, I don't see any sense.
Your evidence: A fiction novel. Man. If you don't want to have a rational discussion, it's fine. I presented a resource in my last comment to address your Charles Dickens "argument."
You'd have to understand and read about private law society (or understand the simple reality of self-ownership) to be able to have this conversation in a meaningful way.
My evidence: logic. If you don't want a rational discussion, it's fine. Just don't ignore what people say.
A private police is like a state police without democratic control and additional profit interest, which is always good for some corruption.
For the other point: If you prefer scientific papers to a novel, feel free to take them.