You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: My initial investigation how I am doing it... (and a public apology)
Mhh.. @steemed's post about the quasi-decentralisation of Steemit was definitely a nice read :D. He also talks about having a "list of writers"- I guess referring to a list of others he auto-upvotes. Looking at how tight his voting circle is in recent days I dont expect that to have changed.
Well Steemed and Bernie (in his nextgencrypto role) both flagged my other post from the other day about if you go in looking for idiocy, then idiocy is what you will find.
Note: It was not abusive, it was not spam, it was not plagiarism, and it did inspire a lot of discussion. So that leaves either they thought the rewards were too high even though it clearly was more substantial than Bernie's own post which was making more than it for a couple of paragraphs calling out people like me as morons (I was specifically listed in the title of his article). So doesn't seem disagreement over rewards is valid either.
Thus, yet another example proving my point on my past few articles on the subject.