The teachings of the priests and the tradition of our fathers doesn't satisfied religious philosophers

Image Source

In attempting how far they can set up religion upon the standards of reason, rather than fulfilling the questions which normally emerge from an industrious and scrutinous request. They paint, in the most heavenly colors, the order, magnificence, and shrewd course of action of the universe, and afterward solicit, if such an eminent show from intelligence could continue from the happy concourse of atoms, or if chance could deliver what the best virtuoso can never adequately appreciate.

We should not look at the justness of this contention. Lets might enable it to be as solid as the adversaries and accusers can want. It is adequate, from this extremely reasoning, the inquiry is totally theoretical, and that, when, in the philosophical disquisitions, some deny a fortune and a future state, they undermine not the establishments of society but rather propel standards which they themselves must permit to be solid and palatable.

Who are the accusers that the boss or sole contention for a divine existence is gotten from the order of nature where there seem such signs of intelligence and outline, that you think it luxurious to relegate for its cause, either possibility, or the visually impaired and unguided power of issue. This is a contention attracted from effects to causes.

Image Source

From the order of the work, they induce, that there more likely than not been undertaking and thinking ahead in the worker. On the off chance that they can't make out this point, they permit that their decision comes up short and they pretend not to set up the determination in a more noteworthy scope than the wonders of nature will legitimize. These are their concessions.

They want to check the results. At the point when construe a specific cause from an effect, they should extent the one to the next, and can never be permitted to credit to the cause any qualities, yet what are precisely adequate to deliver the effect.

A body of ten ounces brought up in any scale may fill in as a proof, that the counterbalancing weight surpasses ten ounces, yet can never bear the cost of a reason that it surpasses a hundred, If the cause be not adequate to create it, we should either dismiss that cause, or add to it such qualities as will give it a simply extent to the effect.

Image Source

In the event that we credit to it farther qualities, or confirm it equipped for delivering different effects, we can just enjoy the permit of guess, and self-assertively assume the existence of characteristics and energies, without reason or authority. A similar govern holds, regardless of whether the cause allocated be beast oblivious issue or a discerning shrewd being.

On the off chance that the cause be known just by the effect, we never should credit to it any qualities, past what are absolutely imperative to deliver the effect, by any tenets of simply reasoning, return once more from the cause, and derive different effects from it, past those by which alone it is known to us. Nobody, only from seeing one of Zeuxis' photos, could know, that he was likewise a statuary, and was an artist no less skilful in stone and marble than in colors.

The gifts and taste, showed in the specific work before us. These we may securely close the worker to be had of. The cause must be proportioned to the effect and in the event that we precisely and exactly extent it, we should never discover in it any qualities, that point farther, or bear the cost of a deduction concerning some other plan or execution.

Image Source

References:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philosophy-religion
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Ancient_Philosophy