You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What do you Think About Extreme Vetting?
" If the humanist drivel had not subverted the existing sociocultural matrix of the Middle East, then the current sociopolitical collapse of many Islamic nations would not have been possible."
What a load of crap. It wasn't humanism or democracy that has left the ME shattered. It was terrorism; bombs, and tanks. That's not humanism. It's terrorism, and seems to be the only form of government you support.
How did Egypt descend into chaos? How did Libya transform from functioning nation-state into a chaotic warzone? How did Syria shatter into fragmented fiefdoms? The Western poison of humanism and toxic "pop" culture destabilised the once prosperous societies into the current mess in the Middle East. Funded by the humanist "charity" fronts, these color revolutions destabilised and destroyed functioning nation-states by using social malcontents as their instrument of terror. For "freedom," "democracy," "human rights," and other humanist drivel, decades of civil war is an acceptable cost for your humanist religious fanatics.
Rather than using obvert mililtary force, as the US employed in the second Iraq war, the West now prefers to utilise infectious ideas, spread by NGOs and "humanitarian" charities, to destabilise societies, cultures, and civilisations. Humanism is nothing more than rebellion against established social order, in a dream to found some fantasy utopia. Contrary to your humanist religious belief system, many human societies, past and present, function efficiently and prosperously without the need for your "freedom," democracy, and "rights" drivel. In fact, most human beings would rather not be subject to the Terror of the French Revolution, the blood orgies of the French commune, or the necessity of genocidal wars against the "natives" in order that they may enjoy some additional previleges. Only those vicious enough to believe that their own convenience outweighs the potential misery of millions would deploy legions of humanist missionaries to undermine functioning societies.
The rhetoric of propagandists is not actually able to be reconciled with their actions. Humanist claims are made, and terrorism is actually what is effected. This is not a reflection on humanism, but on the quality of overlords. They are shit quality today, and not less so in the West. Historically, the vampiric overlords have proved to parasitize society as rampantly as possible, and this is vastly facilitated with modern propaganda techniques.
Fortunately, we will soon have thought reading tech to counter lying propagandists with, and the utility of propaganda will fall off a cliff. Fakebook has claimed to be able to directly translate thoughts, and soon lying politicians will no longer be able to lie their way to power.
And, overt military force is the whole point of propaganda. It's not either or, but how they work together. We're told we're paying the military to save babies from being torn out of incubators, but the truth is we're the ones swiping incubators as an act of war. The sooner such duplicity ends the sooner actual civilization will be possible, rather than the incessant parasitism that has characterized barbaric industrial society the last few centuries.
We don't need missionaries. We need profiteers that prevent parasitism from extracting their wealth. Since that is an economic motivation, it is a lowest common denominator that will ensure the broadest adoption of distributed production tech possible. That is real humanism, not the specious drivel of propagandists.
The right brand of humanism was not tried?
Terrorism is not humanism at all. Rhetoric is not action. You posture as unable to grasp the difference, but I am confident you are not as clueless as you pretend to be.
Right . . . true humanism was never enacted. Much like true communism, or true socialism, has never been tried. Stalin wasn't a communist; Hitler wasn't a socialist; and the Terror wasn't enforced by humanists. The reason for the ocean of ink used to propagate humanism is because ideas have no real world consequences.
If you've ever taken an IQ test, you'll be familiar with this format:
rhetoric is to action as humanism is to a) terrorism, b) propaganda, or c) both.