RE: Eating the Young... You Are What You Eat
I am not a fan of soft drinks, candy, or other such treats. I don't use makeups or take vaccines. I note many of the products on the list you provided are very popular, and that even though I don't buy them and use them, I have, from time to time, had a Gatorade or Mountain Dew. If even I have ingested foetal human tissues via such vectors there can be very few Americans free from this taint.
That I would NEVER have voluntarily consumed human tissue, yet probably have via some of these vectors, is extraordinarily disturbing to me. I am rightly pissed off. This is a huge failure of government to protect us from potential contaminants. It is obscene that labeling laws have not provided that human tissues are listed in ingredients of these products.
I am still processing this, and do not fully comprehend my outrage yet.
What I do know already is that this is perhaps the single most disturbing trigger I have been subjected to, and I say that having suffered a coordinated financial, legal, and social assault via local, regional, national, and international governments, corporations, and people I trusted with my life, that stripped me of the entirety of my assets, family, and freedom. That was bad.
This - that I have been slipped foetal tissues via products offered to me by people that did not know contained them - is qualitatively worse. Being ripped off and nearly murdered is objectionable, but not weird. Even being betrayed by my ex is understandable. She committed perjury and stole my money by fraud. Fairly simple to grasp.
Slipping aborted foetuses into soft drinks sold to people who don't know because it's not in the ingredients? I am having difficulty grasping the motivation that could get someone to do this, except they delight in the idea of tricking people into slurping down murdered babies.
There is a line that most people don't cross. Mike Tyson said Don King would sell his momma for a dolla. He didn't even contemplate that someone would sell murdered human babies by slipping them into our food. Mike Tyson's implication of Don King's lack of ethical standards didn't even approach this boundary.
This is way beyond that line.
Thanks!
You can relax, as the claims made here appear to be false, bro! :)
No human or other animal tissue has ever been used to make the products listed.
Whew! As a vegan this issue is something I take seriously.
The only thing out of this that I consume is coffee creamer made by Nestle (Carnation). I believe this is done on purpose as part of a Satanic agenda. By that I don't mean a bunch of ritualistic, supernatural mumbo jumbo. This is so clearly antithetical to God's plan... Satanism in its most fundamental form inverts God's plan and patterns of behavior that suit Him.
The ultimate plan of the elites and their minions is to distance mankind from God by any and all means necessary. There is also a pecuniary interest. Baby harvesting is big money... when I wrote about human trafficking and organ harvesting I made the point that nothing goes to waste! The closer to delivery a baby is to jestation the more it is worth in the "parts" market. This is the "drug epidemic" of the 2000's... and FAR more profitable than drugs!
My good friend, I have now had time to research your post. Senomyx has been merged with Firmenich, so there was some obscurity there, as the Senomyx site itself is no longer online, and I was a bit stymied looking directly into the horses mouth. However, I did seek the originator of the story you have told in your post, and wound up on Children of God for Life's website where they state that the claim that foetal cells are in any food product they are aware of is false.
It looks like Senomyx used the Foetal Cell line mentioned in your post as a means to assay flavorants - not making such things out of foetal tissues themselves. While this is repugnant, it is NOT IN MY FOOD, which is the claim you made.
It is difficult to convey the degree of my outrage at thinking I had eaten dead babies. I realize you would not make this claim knowing it to be false. However, I feel you did not adequately research the matter before making the post, and, while understandable, this has caused me no little distress. I note you are a good writer, and able to make equivocal statements regarding claims you have not verified. I don't see that you did this, and instead simply repeated a false claim as if you had verified it.
I have learned to have confidence that you state things you know as true, and point out things you are not certain of. Had you stated you had not verified this claim, I would have not been needlessly outraged and would have found out, as I did, that this was not a true claim. How you state what you post matters a lot to folks that trust you, as I do.
Therefore, I ask you to please verify for yourself the link I have here provided, and use your best judgment to either confirm or recant your claim in this post. I also ask that you respond appropriately to your source for this story, and revise your estimation of that source according to their reponse.
This is the right thing to do.
Thanks!
For the original posts I did on this, I used Mike Adam's blog Natural News.
https://www.naturalnews.com/032043_human_fetal_cells_artificial_flavors.html
The Children of God for Life mentions that Mike passed the false story on. Since they are the original source for the false claim, according to those that made it, their denial is decisive. They didn't actually make the claim that eventually Mike repeated. Mike should be informed so he can retract.
Thanks!
I'll try to get hold of him
Ever read The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks? Worth reading.
I haven't yet. Hope I'll et the time someday.
Thanks!