I appreciate your measured and substantive response to my comment, which I note bears an insufferable tone I did not intend. Scientism we are likely to be quite agreed on, amongst many other things, in particular psychiatry. I also am confident that if you were willing to consider it, Einsteinian relativity is not only reasonable, but I do not see any reason a Bible believer couldn't be comfortable with it - but that's my own opinion, and of no consequence.

I agree that Musk's origins are shrouded in potential complicity with nefarious actors, being formerly partnered with Peter Thiel is a good example, but his creation of Paypal and subsequent businesses since aren't particularly cryptic. Zuckerberg and Schmidt of Google aren't cryptic either, just associated with bad company IMHO.

I value your personal views, and my intention was to seek to enable you to not present them as factual when they were possibly more merely unconvinced of the factual. What is clear to me upon rereading my comment is that my advice in that regard would best be taken by me, for I failed utterly to express that sentiment, and instead sound to me like I am sure of my own subjective grasp. This is not only a great personal lapse, but insulting to you, and I apologize.