‘March for Our Lives’ Exploits MLK’s Grandchild

in #informationwar6 years ago (edited)

Yesterday, the vampires behind the push to transform America into a safe space for spree shooters, enlisted the help of one 9-year-old Yolanda Renee King. She is the only grandchild of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Yolanda took the stage for all of about two and a half minutes. This was just long enough for her to; express her desire that the whole world should be gun free, as well as motivate the crowd with a mantra to chant.


Video Source

Don’t get me wrong, I can totally comprehend where these kids are coming from, and the magical thinking that gets them there. They think if gun ownership is made illegal, then people will simply stop using guns to commit murder. I mean god help these poor kids when the realization dawns on them that murder was already illegal to begin with.

The problem is, these children are not yet well-versed in critical thinking. In fact, there’s a good chance if they continue with their K-12 education, that by the time they leave high school to enter the real world, their ability to think, and consider things critically, will have been completely replaced with nonsensical dogma.

The truly tragic part of this whole situation, is that after many threats to him and his family, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. sought out a gun permit for the purpose of self-defense. The State denied him permission to carry a gun, and later on, he was killed by a gunman.

This poor young girl's mind has been kidnapped and weaponized. Hopefully, her family will intervene, before the school system is allowed to continue on, causing irreparable damage.

Children are born with the innate ability to think critically. “Why?” is their favorite question, as it is the one inquiry which provides them with the most answers. At some point, children learn that it’s inappropriate to ask “why?”, and this is the beginning of the end.

They will be educated in a rigorous and painfully boring environment that systematically dismembers the mind, and its ability to think critically.

After the indoctrination process, if they are lucky their minds will (re)member, the ‘whys’ will come back, and the grown child will once again regain control over his-or-her natural ability to learn via inquiry.



Never forget to ask yourself if you are asking the right questions!

Sort:  

All is distraction now. The US Deep State and its media apparatus need the American people distracted from their war in Syria where they have supported ISIS and other terrorists. Thus, their 9/11 narrative is in jeopardy if the public fully wakes up to that fact. Therefore, false flags and distractions are necessary to cover things up and buy time. The Parkland kids are actors as proven by a movie they all made together in June 2017. A movie clip featuring over 5 of the media rolled out teens features a character that also looks, strangely like Nikolas Cruz.

More info here: (Now Playing on Dtube) Inverted Reality - Media Rolled-Out Main Child Actors From Parkland School Shooting Event Made Foreboding Movie Trailer In June 2017

https://steemit.com/video/@clarityofsignal/now-playing-on-dtube-inverted-reality-media-rolled-out-main-child-actors-from-parkland-school-shooting-event-made-foreboding

Nice article, the way I see it is the globalist are going for a gun grab and using kids which is messes up!... The day we loose our 2 amendment is the day America dies.

Very nice article, and analysis @clarityofsignal, great find!

Progressives don't think someone is grown up enough to pay for their own health insurance until 26 but they think a child is old enough to choose their own gender or call for the removal of rights they are not even old enough to exercise at age 4.

Amazing observations @funbobby51, I like the way you think!

The world would be a significantly better place if guns never existed, as a hypothetical. I don't think anyone is going to argue that making the world gun free is possible..

wouldn't a little gun control be okay or is steemit all about the deepstate conspiracy junkos

Thanks for your comment @studgriffin. The problem with a little gun control is that only law abiding people would obey it. The type of person who is willing to commit murder, or go on a shooting spree, that type of person would exploit the gun laws. They would do so by choosing a soft target, or a gun free zone, and bringing into that zone an "illegal" gun.

So let's say they made the AR-15 illegal, in that type of situation it would only ensure that whatever good guy that might be at the scene, he won't have an AR-15, because the good guy is obeying the law, whereas the deranged gunman, he'll take whatever weapons he chooses.

Basically, this means that all the gun laws would serve to accomplish is to cripple any potential counter-terrorist civilian forces. What is a counter-terrorist civilian force? An armed american who doesn't appreciate watching innocent people die, one who is ready and willing to shut that shit down most expeditiously.

P.S. You are right that most people won't argue that making the world gun free is possible. However, that is what many people who believe in gun control think. Especially young kids who have very little experience with theory and what ought to be. vs. reality and what is.

The ‘March for Our Lives’ movement is turning these kids into useful idiots, and many of them won't even realize it until they are much older, and have a better grasp on reality.

Sure, if the AR-15 or any assault weapon were made illegal there would undoubtedly be a black market for criminals to obtain the guns anyways. That doesn't mean it wouldn't at least reduce the risk of a criminal obtaining a highly destructive rifle.

Raising the legal age to 21 would have prevented Nikolas Cruz from personally buying a gun. If assault weapons were banned period, i am doubtful he would have access to a weapons black market (as a mentally deranged high schooler).

I also disagree with your hypothetical, in that I don't think there should be, or are any "good guys" with guns- outside of people hired for security/the police. The notion of arming more people in public areas and facilities is not intelligent- you don't necessarily have to be mentally ill to get angry enough to pull the trigger. People who own guns should go through strict training (and potentially licensing) that requires clear evidence of responsible gun ownership.

Also, I don't think the march for our lives movement is as willfully ignorant as many believe.. there are many smart kids who can see past our distorted view of how we must think about guns.

If there is anything that comes with this movement, I support delegitimizing all of the congressmen who are NRA puppets... the NRA has had a huge grip on congress for decades now. I am more indifferent on which weapons to ban and more interested in bringing down the gun lobby.

I think any responsible gun owner can see there needs to be some degree of further regulation, required training and background checks when it comes to guns. The fact I can go to a gun show and purchase a high capacity mag AR with minimal difficulty scares me. We spend years training kids to drive, we created strict boundaries and laws for driving and ultimately driving has become safer. I want the same to occur with guns.

Thanks again for sharing your thoughts @studgriffin.
I've pushed my response over to a new thread if you
are interested in picking up where we had left off at.

I wonder why using gun by individual isnt prohibited

using them to shoot innocent people in in fact already prohibited.

Something would surely push u shooting someone who fuck u up if you got a gun . it should be prohibited. Only police should be allowed

must be why no one tries to fuck me up.
meme5.jpg

You must be a very trusting person. We already have an issue in the United States with Police abusing power and shooting inocent people.

You have received an upvote from @nicestbot. I am an automated curation bot trying to make minnows happy.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 64542.61
ETH 3460.20
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.51