" Humanist claims are made, and terrorism is actually what is effected."
Terrorism is not humanism at all. Rhetoric is not action. You posture as unable to grasp the difference, but I am confident you are not as clueless as you pretend to be.
Right . . . true humanism was never enacted. Much like true communism, or true socialism, has never been tried. Stalin wasn't a communist; Hitler wasn't a socialist; and the Terror wasn't enforced by humanists. The reason for the ocean of ink used to propagate humanism is because ideas have no real world consequences.
Terrorism is not humanism at all. Rhetoric is not action. You posture as unable to grasp the difference, but I am confident you are not as clueless as you pretend to be.
Right . . . true humanism was never enacted. Much like true communism, or true socialism, has never been tried. Stalin wasn't a communist; Hitler wasn't a socialist; and the Terror wasn't enforced by humanists. The reason for the ocean of ink used to propagate humanism is because ideas have no real world consequences.
If you've ever taken an IQ test, you'll be familiar with this format:
rhetoric is to action as humanism is to a) terrorism, b) propaganda, or c) both.