Russia was ahead of us in the "race to the moon." Remember? They gave up... Hmmmm. What are they saying now?

in #informationwar6 years ago

Nothing would prove a NWO collaborative that involves all the major nations of the world better than if the moon landings by the USA turn out to have been totally hoaxed. I don't know whether they were or they weren't, but I DO KNOW that if they were hoaxed, that many nations were acquiescent, and that we are thus in an even more desperate race against total global totalitarianism than we would have thought otherwise. For, to have the USA's main rival in the "race" be quiet about a hoax all these years would otherwise stretch incredulity beyond the breaking point.

Consider the following new article:

https://www.apnews.com/1966a07c5a63419fb825ed7a92cec8de

The article doesn't resolve anything, but it does signify that the TPTB, globally, know that everyone of their claims for technological excellence (and thus a presumed right to rule the rest of us) are under a more harsh and glaring light of public skepticism with each passing day. Their mega-failures at U.N. "peace making," "safe and effective vaccines," total failure on proving anthropomorphic climate change, and a whole host of other easily-observable technological failures are an increasing problem for their global mastery and for their desired hegemony over all human thought and action.

I want proof of the U.S.A. landing a craft on the moon and returning the men safely to Earth in 1969 as much as the next guy, and I doubt we will ever get it. We MIGHT get proof it didn't happen. Proof that it did will always be pooh-poohed as lies and CGI by some major element of the rightfully doubtful.

Pardon us while we refuse to believe, without proof, every pronouncement of major governments who admit using lies as a major element of statecraft on a routine bases. That's just commonsense on our part. It doesn't make us "disloyal," (that would be the liars,) stupid, or "conspiracy theorists." It makes us both discerning and patriotic.

Sort:  

Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

What you say on this post is true.

"I want proof of the U.S.A. landing a craft on the moon and returning the men safely to Earth in 1969 as much as the next guy, and I doubt we will ever get it."

I want interest back when it turn out to be a Hoax. Sadly I don't know if we are on a spinning ball or a flat earth. The only good news is no one else knows either.

I have ruled out flat earth on the basis that we know people have circumnavigated Antarctica and found it to be only a 12,000-16,000 mile journey, not the required 60,000 miles a flat Earth would necessitate.

I find your post to be filled with education and common sense and for that I thank you!

My 25 years of experimentation has taught me that you cannot use logical conditions for which you have no Personal knowledge. Is the same as testimony, which hasn't much value when making statements about those logical conditions.

"I have ruled out flat earth on the basis that we know people have circumnavigated Antarctica"

The word know has a special meaning. The way in which you wrote the sentence provides meaning that I am pretty sure you did not intend. When you said we "know people have circumnavigated Antarctica" I am pretty sure you didn't mean that you personally know the people. I do not mention this to say that you are being dishonest. I share this with you so that you can see that how people use terms correctly or incorrectly (Which the investigator cannot know), determines the value of the written words

At this time I don't know what the shape of the Earth is, because I can't know. Not because I am stupid, but because the conditions necessary for me to know are at this time not possible for me to perform. Can't go to the moon actually means can't know.

When I consider the fact that many who make claims to have gone have rescinded there claims (Astronauts). NASA has been caught deceiving over and over again. The people in association with NASA have also been caught over and over again as LIAR's. Well to me the real condition is listen to them at your own risk. lol

Hmmm... Food for thought, for sure.

For me "God hates a liar". Once a fraud always a fraud in law. Personally I just wish the honest would stop upholding, putting forth or supporting (understanding) the liar's. If you don't know because you have not an experience that provides substantial evidence, than stick with "I don't know" cause that is the truth.

Looking forward to more of your awesome post.

what the?? that's a reflection in the helmet cover of a person with no space suit?

That's sure what it looks like. I haven't researched it though.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.17
JST 0.028
BTC 69231.75
ETH 2482.33
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.41