You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Greta Thunberg Soros supported and very likely funded as well

in #informationwar5 years ago (edited)

I have viewed this video before and left some comments on it. It's one of many disinformation videos, imo. I include GWPF, Tony Heller, Sky News Australia, Heartland Institute, Independent Institute, Friends of Science, among many others, in that group. Some are in the pockets of the fossil fuel interests.

The actual data is usually accurate, but the conclusions drawn from the data are misleading and even absurd. Tony creates disinformation and propaganda through lies of omission and logical fallacies. Here's an example from video, "My Gift to the Climate Alarmists." The video shows (6:45) a chart of the number of 90+ deg days at Waverly, Ohio from about 1900 to present. First of all, climate change pertains to the average surface temps of the entire globe, not just one city, region, or even country. So right off the bat, this whole section is local weather and is not relevant to human-induced climate change. Second, human-induced climate change was insignificant until about 1950. So it's relevant in the period from 1950 to present. Any climate changes, severe weather events, natural disasters, etc that occurred before 1950 were naturally caused and not relevant. But, Tony claims that climate scientists were trying to hide the heat waves of the 1920-1940 period in the US because temps were higher than present day. No one was trying to hide anything. Even though temps were higher than today, they were naturally caused, were local weather, and occurred before 1950, so they were irrelevant in three ways.

Again, human-induced climate change affects the entire globe from 1950 to present, and warming surface temps are disrupting the jet stream and ocean currents, which is leading to erratic and abnormal weather in different parts of the world. For example, it's causing record warm temps in the Arctic, record winters in the Eastern US, record drought in Africa, record wildfires in Australia, record rains in the Midwest US, and record typhoons in the Pacific region. The key word here is "record" or "abnormal." Of course, weather events, natural disasters, etc are still occurring naturally as well.

Sort:  

If everything about climate science is true(it isn't, its all based on projections with flawed input data) then there wouldn't need to be a "Union of Concerned Scientists" is the first thing I am going to say.

The truth is the truth and is reproduceable. Models that have flawed data inputs isn't truth, anyone can change the inputs and make the output be what they want.

You know what was big during my growing up? The "global ice age that was coming" despite, then it was "Y2K!!!!" then "Global Warming!!!!" now it is "Climate Change".

There are plenty of things I have read that disprove what is going on but it all has to be taken together.

Here is just one simple one https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

@truthforce writing

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 66899.66
ETH 3464.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.80