Thanks for the reply @cryptogee

The people that i have seen getting (what i would call attacked by the law bots) hardly have $0.01 - $0.05 rewards per post. I personally feel that is about right for sharing some decent content, if it's theirs or not (attribution given or not).

What winds me up is when i see all the lawbots displaying injustice.... i.e. letting "some people or themselves" away with stuff.... like allowing a hacker to post stuff on here for monetary rewards! or selfvoting themselves or creating irrelevant lists for monetary rewards!

Yet sharing decent unattributed content (clearly not doing it for the measly rewards of $0.05 a post) they are doing it to share some alternative content / perhaps support their non steemit blog, is justified & attacked.

One good reform the law bots could carry out, would be to not attack someone if the rewards are lower than $0.025

This reward level turns to dust (the dust cap threshold) so the owner (plagiarist or not) does not receive any reward anyways.

This would save the law bots some work & make them appear less authoritarian. Whilst increasing user retention rates and would help steemit to prosper.