You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Stupid Steemit and most of its Deepstate Witnesses Sucks
Very bizarre that you jump to a 'deep state' conspiracy theory, when the reason they're flagging is right there in the article you copied.
In order to stop the flags @amnlive needs to do two things.
Contact Steemcleaners via Steemit chat/discord
Prove that it isn't plagiarising its content.
Once it does those two things, the flags will stop.
I tried to reply to you, but was silenced by the platform because I had not enough Resource Credits and had to power up some of my Steem.
My answer is in this post:
https://steemit.com/informationwar/@pagandance/how-steemit-silences-you-silently
First it was @themarkymark who was attacking @amnlive with his @badcontent bot.
Then @cheetah joined in with him.
After I asked him the reason for the systematic harassing of @amnlive, @themarkymark finally gave up but @cheetah kept on going.
After that @mack-bot joined the flag war against @amnlive.
Recently the same Deepstate @steamcleaners gangsters have begun targetting @socioecohistory in the same way.
This platform is rotten to the core and is being sabotaged by the top owners and witnesses.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@pagandance/dan-larimer-on-steemit
Very interesting Larimer quotes!
I don't think the witnesses are paid off by the deepstate, because if the deep state actually exists as an organisational entity, I'm pretty sure Steemit witnesses are too low level to let in on 'the secret'.
However I will thank you for those Larimer comments, it's good to actually hear for the first time (as far as I'm concerned) why he actually left.
Regarding @amnlive, have they proved that they are not plagiarising content? Maybe by posting something on the original news site?
Cg
@cryptogee
This is the problem with the law bots, they assume guilt. Peeps on here should NOT have to prove their "plagiarism" innocence on discord, so that they can post here, there will be no one left / no alternative content, if we continue down that road.
The law bots need to reform in 2019.
I disagree @cryptothoughts for these reasons;
As far as I'm aware @cheetah works by scouring the web for similar content, if it finds a copied article, it posts a comment on the steemit article saying that it found similar content and puts a link to that content. It also gives the author time to contact it via chat.
It does this a number (I'm not sure how many) of times, if the poster keeps ignoring, it then starts to flag.
Of course a lot of us have multiple platforms which we post on, so it is fairly easy to prove it really is us.
However if say an account that we'll call @X copies some of my stuff and then reposts it here for a reward, then I want them flagged because it's my content so I should get the rewards.
We have to treat this differently from facebook and all the other free social sites. If someone reposts my stuff on those sites, great, they're promoting me. However on Steemit, some people will copy and paste content that doesn't belong to them and make big rewards.
Is that fair?
So maybe the law bots do need to reform, and sharpen up their performance, but we do need them checking for plagiarism.
Cg
Thanks for the reply @cryptogee
The people that i have seen getting (what i would call attacked by the law bots) hardly have $0.01 - $0.05 rewards per post. I personally feel that is about right for sharing some decent content, if it's theirs or not (attribution given or not).
What winds me up is when i see all the lawbots displaying injustice.... i.e. letting "some people or themselves" away with stuff.... like allowing a hacker to post stuff on here for monetary rewards! or selfvoting themselves or creating irrelevant lists for monetary rewards!
Yet sharing decent unattributed content (clearly not doing it for the measly rewards of $0.05 a post) they are doing it to share some alternative content / perhaps support their non steemit blog, is justified & attacked.
One good reform the law bots could carry out, would be to not attack someone if the rewards are lower than $0.025
This reward level turns to dust (the dust cap threshold) so the owner (plagiarist or not) does not receive any reward anyways.
This would save the law bots some work & make them appear less authoritarian. Whilst increasing user retention rates and would help steemit to prosper.
@pagandance comment reposted because i think it's quite an important comment (regardless of who done what etc etc) as i believe we have a lawbot issue on steemit.
The law bots need to reform in 2019.
"First it was themarkymark who was attacking amnlive with his badcontent bot.
Then cheetah joined in with him.
After I asked him the reason for the systematic harassing of amnlive, themarkymark finally gave up but cheetah kept on going.
After that mack-bot joined the flag war against amnlive.
Recently the same Deepstate steamcleaners gangsters have begun targetting socioecohistory in the same way.
This platform is rotten to the core and is being sabotaged by the top owners and witnesses."
https://steemit.com/steemit/@pagandance/dan-larimer-on-steemit