DIALOGUE WITH RESULTS MUST BE THE OBJECTIVE. THE OTHER IS PANTOMIME - VENEZUELA

In how opinions are multiple and, more than a division, it is a sign of political maturity and democratic plurality. Let's not exclude the debate. How do we search, accelerate, facilitate the exit of the regime? There are no points of coincidence. Some think and, act accordingly, is participating in all the electoral events convened by the regime without respecting clear, clean and transparent rules. Do the results matter? It seems that no. Once the process is over, they say they were robbed, but they are ready to participate again or better let them steal again. No one disputes that suicidal vocation. It is a right and they are respected.

There are those who think that it is necessary to return to sit down to dialogue with the regime, no matter how many times they have been mocked in their good faith. And they have very valid arguments. Even in the worst wars there was dialogue. In the most bloody dictatorships there was a need to sit down and negotiate the departure of the dictators. That's true. It is also true that we must have a sense of the opportunity, establish a previous agenda with international observers to guarantee respect for the agreements. Dialogue with results has to be the objective. The other is pantomime.

In all these boards the Venezuelan opposition has played. The regime mocks the agreements, mounts a smear campaign against the opposition and even persecutes those who in good faith participated in the dialogues. Should we go back to dialogue? Obviously yes. When? There is the detail, understanding that the only point amenable to dialogue is to facilitate the exit of the dictator and his clique as a way to overcome the terrible crisis that the country suffers. There is nothing else that can be discussed with a regime that does not change or change. You have to change it. Point.

he one or those who want to participate in another type of dialogue with the regime are in their right. Do not look for excuses, saying that those who do not lend themselves to more pantomimes of the regime, blackmail them. They are in their right to dialogue. No one forbids or denies it. Those who believe that the only point to dialogue is to facilitate the orderly and peaceful departure of the regime, also, are in their right. That is the democratic debate. The leader must guide and convince. Echenle him and do not look for excuses. What is at stake is very important.
The days to come and the train of history will pick up on its pages who or who were right on time. Never forget: the one who plays with a candle risks burning or at least leaving scorched. Is that the fear? The one who is afraid can not dialogue with possibilities of success, or does it? It will dawn and we will see.