You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: ICOs are not for US Citizens? Should ICOs reject self proclaimed US Citizens as a way to reduce legal and regulatory risk?
Interesting idea. Could a US citizen sue the ICO founders claiming discrimination based on incorrect facts (define "excessive")? There is always the ubiquitous "void where prohibited by law" disclaimer on every advertisement, but prohibition by law is vastly different than excessively regulated by law. Also, isn't the compliance with the excessive regulation the onus of the investor, not those offering the investment?
This definitely gets the brain thinking!