Thank you for taking the time to reply to me. If I may answer your points:

1. The picture is from a commons library . It's not my patient, it's a representation of her.
2. I'm not sure how to answer this one, you seem very emotive about it! A case study is the study of a case... that's it, I'm not sure where your rant is coming from. What's brilliant is, I am FREE to post case studies on the internet without censor. There'll be LOTS more in the coming years from me & my colleagues. I'm also not sure how you get from my case to the conclusion that 'homeopathy is bogus'. If what I report is true (it is) then this is an incredible result, regardless of what label you put on it.
3. I'm not sure what my daughter catching Lyme disease has with anything. This case wasn't about my daughter, or Lyme disease. It was about a little girl's adverse reaction to antibiotics, and how she was helped by an infinitesimal amount of arsenic.
4. I'm not sure why you feel I should produce 'evidence' ... this isn't a piece of research I'm attempting to submit to a peer-reviewed journal, it's a case study I'm posting on Steemit. Can antibiotics produce chronic asthma as a side effect? Yes, it's a known possible side effect (along with seizures & a whole host of other things)
5. It's rude to refer to my post as 'drivel'. Your other explanation is possible of course, but doesn't match what the child's mother, me, or her doctor observed. When reality doesn't match your belief structure, it might be time to change the belief structure.

In conclusion, you appear to be an interesting example of internet flora & fauna that I have come across many times. Reading between the lines your belief structure appears to be: 'Homeopathy is nonsense, therefore this post is nonsense'. The cognitive dissonance of your beliefs & the contents of this post was too much to bear, so you felt compelled to reply.

Happy New Year :-)