Dear @chiabertrand,
You are not an Admin nor jury of the MODs recruitment to know anything about the selection and I think you have a complex issue. It's always about you and nobody else and that's why you feel you are better than everyone. I asked you once to take time to reflect before you speak but it seems you don't and have decided to continue your path.
Whatever I say now will never make any sense to you because you are filled with soo much negative and competitive energy and i'll keep using reason and wisdom to deal with all that negativity, ego and pride that's eating you up.
To be honest, you're too small to be hated by me and i'll always use reason over emotions when dealing with you. You raised a series of concerns and ended by concluding we are biased, hate you, and prayed for transparency.
I'll be sharing my personal feedback from the review of the applications but permit me to begin by asking why you applied for the role of MOD when you didn't want to be a MOD?
Only losers filled with empty pride think that way. Since you didn't want to be a MOD, why didn't you just accept it and ask constructive questions instead of bringing up all these competitive negative statements of us being biased and hate you?

I am sure you already know the admin that voted for you. BTW, did you know the admins had 50% evaluation power and that instead of using the 50% they ended up using 20% and giving 80% for community evaluation? Would have been nice if you appreciated the admins for that.

Now to your worries and i invite @desireforku to please come here and read this carefully;

1. A man has 4400 Steem and delegates 10000 steem to his community and another man has 900 Steem and delegates 800 to his community. Who is more loyal and has delegated more to the community. The man who is giving all to his community or the man who has enough and can't give even 50% to his community?
   @b-naj delegated over 90% of his steem to his community and chiabertrand gave just 25% of his steem to the community. Who is more loyal and has delegated more?
2. Send you application and @b-naj's application to any person to read and then you ask them whose's application is better and they will tell you that @b-naj's application is way better than yours. Experience has nothing to do with vision and purpse for community, there are lots of experienced persons who have no vision and that's why with respect to experience, you had more points but your vision for the community was just general talk.
3. Creativity: Talking about language, presentation and graphics, are you saying your language, creativity and graphics are better than his? You mostly write pinglish and he writes English and if you compare both graphics and language not just on these posts, you realize he is way better than you.
4. Endorsements are not upvotes and resteems. Endorsements are comments backing up your application and if you like, count again. e.g. @gerakam wished you luck with your application but endorsed @b-naj's application. So, kindly check and count again. e.g. @gerakam wished you luck with your application but endorsed @b-naj's application. So, kindly check and count again.

You can proceed and remove your delegation from the community like you have already started, it's just further evidence of how egoistic you are.

These said, challenge you to review both application and now that you have grading guidelines, review and let us know what you think.

CC:
@majerius
@saxopedia
@fombae