You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What do you think about this?

in STEEM WATCHERlast year

We want a clear statement from the Steemit team stating how we will treat ai content. What is it? In which category do we put it and what should be its punishment? If there is any statement from @steemitblog we will take action accordingly. There should be a clear statement on this from the official side of the platform.

We will do our best to give them a chance to correct it before using the downvote power.

Sort:  
 last year (edited)

We consider AI generated content to be another form of plagiarism - especially when used for the purpose of reward farming.

Therefore none of the Steemcurator0x accounts should give vote rewards to AI generated content.

We will also not be selecting any individuals or communities who use, or allow to be used, AI generated content unless for specific demarcated purposes.

It is up to you and the rest of the community to decide how you want to deal with AI generated content.

Esto me parece excelente, porque la IA es aplicable para muchos espacios laborales, comerciales y académicos, pero en steemit no sería justo recompensar un contenido creado con IA cuando las reglas son claras y se evalúa mediante la prueba de cerebro 🧠.

Esto ayudará a todos los creadores de contenido a seguir siendo fieles y activos en su actividad en la plataforma, y seguiremos teniendo un ecosistema productivo orgánicamente .

Apoyar la IA con recompensas es apoyar la pereza humana y la viveza de muchos, por ello estaré muy al tanto en cada revisión de contenido que hago como Moderadora para mantener a mi comunidad y steemit limpia y libre de IA y así ayudar a otorgar recompensas a los verdaderos creadores de contenido 😊.

Muchas gracias steemcurator01 por aclarar este punto que nos sirve a todos.

Que tenga un excelente día .

The abuse still continues...

@rex-sumon @abuse-watcher

Disappointing you are not responding to this.

Watching and waiting...

 last year 

We have some rules of our own. We try to solve the problem in several steps. Previously we decided to downvote when we couldn't stop the abuser. This is done at the very last stage.

@rex-sumon tried to speak to upmewhale's team once again after the day you replied. We want them to solve this problem without any trouble. However, we have not received any reply so far.

When we get to the last stage we call a meeting with the moderators. If there is consensus at the meeting, and if the founder allows, then we take the downvote decision. But we see there are 20 accounts here. There have huge potential rewards. These rewards are too much to kill, Which we don't want to do alone. If we take the decision of downvote , then you also have to be on the side with downvote. A collective downvote will suppress it.

Ss by @rex-sumon

IMG_20230412_002618.jpg

IMG_20230412_002518.jpg

IMG_20230412_021935.jpg

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 57856.68
ETH 2352.26
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.43