RE: How Does Steemcurator01 Support Affect Authors' Behavior?
Interesting article, but I must object at least in some terms. Centralization continues, and support for quality content is dying. How to require Power Up to a user who does not receive support from large support accounts? I haven't withdrawn steem from the Platform for two months, and the number of votes I receive is insufficient compared to other users who always have a guaranteed vote from SC01, and therefore withdraw their steem. There is no balance in the clubs.
The quality of the platform is going, and interest and corruption continue to rule. I have not seen a solid proposal that attracts investors. Take a look at other blockchains that have grown exponentially in recent months, while Steemit has stalled above 30 cents.
More incentives need to be created, and curatorship needs to be balanced. Good Post are ignored, communities are slowing their growth while others decide to shut down.
Really strong initiatives are needed!
I agree with you that quality posts should be more supported. But who should support them? This leads to the Steemit team having to do it. But this is not the case.
This platform was conceived as decentralized. It was planned that users would support each other. Unfortunately, most people withdrew their money. Therefore, the Steemit team was forced to create steemcurators.
If we all built our accounts, in 1-2 years we would not have to rely on SC01, we would read posts and support those we like. And the authors of the best posts would earn the most.
Another important problem is fraud. Fraudsters get big money for low-quality posts. This money should go to bloggers who work hard to create quality content. It was the fraudsters who drove out the bloggers.
Unfortunately, the most supported users of Sc01 are only limited to farming your contents; the Diary Game is only good for that: There is no effort or dedication. If you check the activity of those who receive the support, you will notice that they publish and then leave, without leaving a feedback to other users. Do you think that a user who does not have quality in his posts can support quality posts? That, at least in my opinion, is false.
So, the clubs have become a ride to indifference. Nobody is for anybody. And then they come with the nerve to say:
"I'm triple dolphin..."
How can they not be if Sc01's support for them is exaggerated and unfair!
I value your thought, I wish everyone had your same projections:
Unfortunately, it won't be like that, not while the curator continues to reach the "same cheeky always".