RE: How Does Steemcurator01 Support Affect Authors' Behavior?
Thank you for taking the time and effort to write such a great comment. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued support. I often notice your upvote below my posts. You are like steemcurator09 to me :)
there are two sides to every coin
I agree. Any solution has advantages and disadvantages. For example, clubs negatively affect charity accounts because they are forced to withdraw money. At the same time, SC01 always generously supports charity posts, which shows that the Steemit team are normal people.
But if it is about reducing the supply on the market, then this stake MUST also be used to destroy the STEEM overproduced by abuse with downvotes.
Not so long ago, SC01 responded to requests for ending plagiarism and punished fraudsters. Tomorrow I will be curating content for the first time with the steemcurator06 account. One of the rules is not to give Downvote to anyone. I think the same rule applies to SC01.
At the same time, SC01 actively supports the fight against fraud by papi.mati and community moderators. I believe that the goal of the Steemit team is to return decentralization to the platform. That is, the community must fight the scammers themselves, and the Steemit team will help.
Unfortunately, the blogging community is now just an insect against the big elephant of the scam community. However, we need to keep working.
Bid bots remain a cancer of the community. They offer the authors such favorable conditions that it will never be possible to overcome them. Bid bots feed fraud the most.
Yes, it can. At least it used to be possible. There is one account, @null.
The option with the @null account allows you to turn the inflation model of the Steemit economy into a deflationary one. To do this, it is enough that 10% of the amount from each transaction is sent to this account.
Maybe it can be done now. When was the last time someone tried to write a proposal? I think the proposal system is working, it's just that the Steemit team is waiting for the community to mature and initiate big changes.
In my opinion, Steemit is rising from its knees, reviving, but I can not say for sure, because I am still a newcomer. However, I see positive changes, new initiatives. Even the fruitless fight against windmills by papi.mati is extremely important. And it would be more effective if more users who are not indifferent to the state of this platform joined its Downwote Trail.
In general, I can write a lot on this topic, but little can be done.
Since when has the steemit team communicated and with whom?
Steemit does not respond to criticism
The Clubtags50-100 are not conducive, that is not gladly read by those who use them, self-criticism is not so easy, especially when it comes to money!
The steemcurator influences the opinion of most users through big votes many say that will be okay and only see the expected vote of the Steemcurator
Seit wann kommuniziert das steemit team und mit wem ?
Auf Kritik reagiert steemit nicht
Die Clubtags50-100 sind nicht förderlich , das wird von jenen die sie nutzen nicht gerne gelesen , Selbstkritik ist nicht so einfach erst recht nicht wenns um Geld geht !
Der steemcurator beeinflusst die Meinung der meisten User durch Bigvotes viele sagen sich das wird schon Ok sein und sehen dabei nur das zu erwartende Vote des Steemcurator
VgA
Sometimes SC01 answers questions, and lately they do it more often. For example, when @coding-gorilla consults about a new interface.
I agree with you that there are very few readers among us. Most authors publish a post and wait for the money. The trouble is that without a steemcurator, bloggers will leave the platform and only scammers and bid bots will remain. Unfortunately, very few users build their accounts and can support others.