Hand wealth and poverty

The hand was within the willpower of distributing wealth and poverty at will. With this will power saying "We appreciated your sustenance", everyone was in the account and dream of the property that would hit him from the property and property that would be scattered.

src
This imaginary collective bond was the thought that undermined the bond strength between collective thought. Although this is i mge awakened with everyone; The work of distributing the collective wealth according to discretion concealed the intention of the property to be given to Pharaoh and Moses. The trap set for collective formation was everyone.

It was wanted to think that everyone would gain collective power. Fishing was the skipped bait. He determined the fates of the people with his hand distributing property! The environment in which the property was distributed was within the expansion of the exponential behavior of the new situation and the new situation.

This opening was the tense and conflictual situation that progressed with the formation of the time that interfered with the lack of property and the lack of property. With games such as the lending of the wealthy in this tension and the borrowing of the poor; distractions and creeps began, which was a de-escalation.

The lender (property owner) took many times more than the borrower (the lack of property), and the rich lent to the poor, he was born. When paying back the debt, you were putting a small cauldron in the cauldron. In other words, you paid what you received as 50, as 60. The voltage drops when buying 50. While paying 60, the exploitation continued.

There was a little neglect here. The hand would pay many times more than what it borrowed from you in terms of life and property in the hereafter. This covenant was an indispensable covenant of the slave alliance and the motto of faith. So what you would buy was not given to you in the world, it was promised. It was hoped. In the face of this situation, there was no hope from El

The wealthy in contradiction, which gave the wealthy-poor distinctive class polarization, was making an exploitation flow over the collective forces of the poor who lacked the power of production. In this context, INTEREST was an instrument of exploitation, which the LONOR Giver Hand's interest and lending rule El put forward according to the flow. His name was debt, not interest.

The lending business or the lending business made sense of being taken back multiple times by the promise of El's will. Hand's leading behavior over the absence; It was a trap referring to the exploitation of the bodily labor forces of poverty and the gas of the tense environment. Debt business was allowed to rape the poor employment.

Borrowing and taking interest is not an element of collective building. The collective system itself had the power of an irreversible warehouse depreciation (wear, tear, and obsolescence). Collective depreciation existed with general benefit. Collective depreciation had turned into amortization of the master's benefit with the slave system.