Hi, thanks for the comment.

I see what you say about the problem of publishing content in just one community that may be of interest to several groups of people and in truth I had not thought about it. I am not very knowledgeable in the use of the tribes, but by the explanations that I have seen, I can add the labels of the tribes in any order and it allows me to load the content to share it with them, it is good to give diffusion, but if it is the case of the communities, because I already did an experiment and only upload the publication to the community if the label that identifies it is in the first position, so it would have no effect if I place it in third, second or any position other than the first.

This characteristic that the label of the community must be placed first and that only works if it is there, severely limits the possibilities of spreading the posts.

Not being able to control who publishes is also a thing that would have to be fixed, otherwise we could have cases of massive spam attacks by malicious users, I think that the creation of permits and the administration of them has to be improved, I have not I have done a lot on other networks, but I think things like this have been seen in Facebook groups and other similar things.

On the other hand, I would like there to be a way to implement a "Discussion Table" or a way for community members to discuss when a post is not considered as adjusted to what the community considers as such, that is , a kind of argued vote that reminds me of the "Classical Greek Ostracism" system where citizens could vote on the people they considered should be subjected to a forced withdrawal from public life for a period of time, in this situation it would be for put the community posts to the vote and evaluate that the members of the community share their contents to some extent or at least do not consider them totally inappropriate for the development of the community.

P.S.: Thank you for inviting people to discuss and contribute their perspectives.