RE: DISCUSSION: Best way to handle Community Curators program requirements (starting 1st of May)
Hi Piotr,
I think your proposition is quite good. I see only one problem in it. You will have 10 or more upvotes per day to give but I don't think that there will be so many steem only posts available within the community.
I don't know how many people read this post here but I think not everybody from the community will see it and many won't know about this if they are not in discord.
I think it would be good for the authors that plan to write a post for steem only, that they write a link at the end of the post. Something like This is a project-hope steem only post. Check out what this means. This link would lead to a post, that has to be written (I could do that) where it is explained what this "steem only" is.
Like that when reading a post, people would see it and go to the link and learn why they should produce posts for steem only. I believe that you need at least 10 posts a day to be able to use the maximum of the account.
Another point would be that on this explanatory post, there is an explanation why people should comment and upvote the steem only posts. You could maybe dedicate 1 vote per day in 20 5% upvotes for good comments on these posts. People could also learn that it is a good idea to upvote these posts since after 4-5 days they will get a powerful upvote and there would be interesting curation rewards.
Like that I believe that a lot of people would be interested in producing steem only posts for at thes least the duration of this curation program.
What do you think?
Best regards,
Achim
It is always a real pleasure for me to read your publications.
You are so intelligent!
Your proposals are always great and you have full knowledge of how Project Hope works.
Here you made us two great approaches:
Place a phrase and a link at the end of each publication.
Brilliant! This would indicate to us as curators, which would be the publications that want to opt for the upvote. Perhaps the posted link could point to this same Piotr post.
Give encouragement to valuable comments. These stimuli could be given with any of our other accounts.
I would like to make the clarification that, since the curation process will begin on 05-01-2020, then the publications that were made 4-5 days ago, would be the first to be curated with the new delegation.
What do you think @achim03? (cc: @crypto.piotr.)
Thanks a lot for your reply and the compliment ;-).
I think it would be definitely easier for curators to place the upvotes if there was a link at the end of the post and it would probably encourage people to write such posts.
I think that this is something that we should plan to do more in depth in the long term. There are a lot of communities that all speak about "let's comment and interact". It would be great to have a tool in project.hope that would support the commenters!
It could be an account that just upvotes comments but it should be powerful enough so that the loss because of the reward curve is not too big. There could be even a curation trail -> project.hope the community where you might get powerful upvotes for your comments! That doesn't sound too bad ;-)
Wow, man!
You have many valuable ideas.
There is a downside to voting comments.
I don't know the equation, but I'm sure you do.
This should be thoroughly studied to incorporate it into the project economy.
Hi @juanmolina
I'm not sure if you're aware, but I even got to know achim03 personally during my trip to switzerland. And we've discussed idea behind project.hope many times since then :)
Cheers, Piotr
Yes, you told me that you had personally met achim03. I imagine he must be a great person too.
Cheers.
Nice shot there @Achim03. We must encourage engagement in every good way possible.
Thank you for your suggestions @achim03 :)
Comment upvoted