RE: Astable Multivibrator Timing Signal Generation Circuits | Using NE555 Timer IC.
Greetings my dear friend, @rmm31 I hope you are well. First of all, it is nice to know that you have observed here.
First of all, you have given an example where you have converted it into reality and shown it. This is a full tutorial post where you have presented all the topics starting from the LED circuit and made it an external manifestation.
I also show a lot of interest in electrician topics. Because I repair most of my own necessary things myself. I do not do it professionally and I do not show any tutorial posts to anyone because this is not my commercial business or organization and I do not have time for it.
My friend, I want to inform you that we, the community admins and moderators, have been observing @imranhassan for a long time. His various posts and tutorial posts are created through AI.
https://steemit.com/steem-for-bangladesh/@imranhassan/adjustable-timer-circuit-using-ic-555
The tutorial posts are created through this, which is why we have put him in the eye of suspicion. Moreover, in his posts, only a drawing and circuit or other information are mentioned, there is no real manifestation or creation on any device. The problem is here. He only creates a post using AI to create a drawing. I am sharing the link of one of his posts below.
I love electronic devices and electronics, which does not mean that people will use it outside its rules on the platform. I think there should definitely be a manifestation in the tutorial posts. Then there will be no use of AI and other users will be able to learn through this tutorial and show interest in education. I think that an electronic device should not be trapped in only drawing on paper and pen.
I apologized to you for the mistake in that post. And you looked at me with an apologetic look. And showed it in the comments and told me to be careful. Since then I have been careful. Now you are saying that all my posts are made by AI and I cannot post, it is very painful.🙏
Your tutorial post or informational post must have an output in the post you create with the diagram. Then it will be converted into a tutorial post and a proper informational post. Otherwise, we will definitely consider it to be created from artificial intelligence.
https://steemit.com/hive-188837/@ubongudofot/steem-electronics-1-a-tutorial-on-how-to-construct-led-chaser-circuit-using-555-timer-ic-and-4017-decade-counter-part-1
A complete tutorial post should look like this.
Moreover, I don't know if you have any educational qualifications or certificates in electronics. Even if you did, we would have understood that you are a skilled electrician. If someone fails using your methods, who will take the responsibility?
I think the comments on this post and tutorial posts @steemcurator01 and @steemcurator02 should give an example of what they should be like.
Okay, you're welcome, I'll show a real character in each post, so I'll have to spend some money, I'll buy a veroboard combo pack and bring it tomorrow. I have some old parts and some parts that I can make with them but I need to buy some ICs and capacitors.
Dear brother, not just for this post, but in the kind of diagram tutorials you post in the future, you must also show your instruments in real life, only then can we learn from it.
Okay, no problem, I just need to spend some time and money and nothing else. I have updated the post above and shown you my actual parts.
Sorry friend, I want to tell you this, for any kind of tutorial post you have to actually create something and show it, and I think there must be an output.I don't think you can ever teach someone just by art and writing down the details of the instruments. Besides, you are presenting various circuit components and instruments with images downloaded from the internet. You should use your own images.
My other diagram posts clearly show the input and output voltages. The post you commented on is not a complete circuit but a basic diagram of an adjustable and monostable timer circuit using a 555 IC. In such diagrams, the input-output is not directly visible, as it depends on the value of the resistance and capacitor used by the user.
The more resistance or capacitance is used, the slower the output pulse will be — and the less value is used, the faster it will be. This is an educational diagram, through which a user can understand for himself how to control the time and pulse.
I would like to respectfully state that no wrong information has been provided here. In the future, I will try to explain each diagram more clearly and present it with real evidence. And I am sending you two screenshots from the mobile software I use.
cc: @rmm31
If you post only with diagrams, there is a possibility of AI. That is why you have been asked to mention it with actual images and we will see an output from there. I don't want to talk about it anymore, I have given you a guide. Moreover, I also found AI in your post, so I warned you and guided you. Thank you.
🤝🤝🤝
Con todo respeto te indico que No puedes alegar que la existencia de uso de IA, cuando no lo haz marcado en la verificación. Así que es improcedente ese argumento.
La electrónica es universal, los conceptos son los mismos, las hojas de datos de componentes son las mismas en cualquier parte del mundo, la aplicación de un IC 555 es muy amplia.
Cualquier persona puede o no aplicar el diagrama descrito por el autor en cualquier momento.
No es necesario construir, porque un diagrama es útil para:
1 Guía
2 Construir
3 Reparar
4 Modificar
5 Estudiar
Por lo menos el Autor dibuja los diagramas en forma más entendible, ilustra el componente físicamente además de hacer una breve descripción del efecto que hará en el circuito
Ahora, para determinar sí funciona o no, es necesario construirlo, ¿se atrevería a construirlo y aplicarlo en algún proyecto? De esta forma decirle al autor con base, si funcionó o no.
Porque en esencia, de eso se tratan los diagramas que dejan los fabricantes de componentes electrónicos. Para que las personas desarrollen proyectos a partir de ellos.
Considero que antes de hacer un comentario tan invasivo, es necesario que conozca del tema y así argumentar con base.
https://steemit.com/scouts-y-sus-amigos/@rmm31/respuesta-a-manuelhooks-proyector-edson-no-enciende
Don't you understand the difference between this post and his post?
Puedes sugerirle mejorar tu contenido, más no refutar lo que ha mostrado, porque lo que mostró está bien. Compartió un diagrama para ser aplicado en un proyecto donde se requiera un temporizador de señales.
Sugerir es mejor que refutar un contenido. Te aseguro que si lo orientas a eso, el autor entenderá que el contenido puede hacerse más valioso mostrando la aplicación o el funcionamiento en tiempo real.
Pero acorralar al autor en esa forma que te expresaste, es molesta. A mí me generó molestia, porque es más fácil criticar antes que orientar.
Sorry I couldn't reply to you I informed him on Discord and guided you can ask him. @imranhassan
My friend @rmm31 rightly said — diagrams themselves are a powerful learning tool. And that can be used by anyone today, not tomorrow — even in ten years.
I have taken every criticism with respect. In the future, I will create better content with real evidence.
Thanks to everyone who encouraged me to learn.