You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Some additional, thoughts regarding the possible reduction of the 13 weeks to 4...Does it really matter?
I don't think it matter much, but I lean slightly for it.
I don't know if it is worth the extra programming and testing... Shrugs.
13 weeks feels like ...forever.
Could it work? Unless something is implemented...we can only guess. Although I do believe that Yaba's approach is really interesting.
Interesting or not it is a full reworking of a lot of code. vs changing a date.
Is it really? I think it's the same case...changing a date after one has fulfilled their commitment of staying powered up for 13 weeks....
It is one easiest thing to change and test, it has done before from two years to 13 weeks. It is not an extra work at all?
We have to understand through investors perspective 4 weeks is much better than 13 weeks.
Posted via Steemleo