You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Some additional, thoughts regarding the possible reduction of the 13 weeks to 4...Does it really matter?

in SteemLeo5 years ago

I like both @yabapmatt's idea of a 13 week commitment before being able to power down. Maybe a setup where the 13 week gets a power down without penalty and a 4 week costs a 10-15% contribution to the DAO to power down.

Your point about the savings account not being used much while there is a pile of liquid steem sitting on the platform is well made. I liked @aggroed's suggestion of being able to put funds into savings, have easier access to those funds while they count like SP for voting and curating but have zero impact on voting for witnesses and the SPS.

While this discussion is of value, I don't think this should be something that is part of the next hardfork. That needs to be devoted to the SMTs as one of the most extensive changes to be made yet. The discussions may yet yield much better ideas than just moving a 13 week power down to 4.

ShadowsPub
Looking for writing inspiration? Receive a set of prompts via email every day. Sign up here

Sort:  

The discussions may yet yield much better ideas than just moving a 13 week power down to 4.

I couldn't agree more. After all I highly doubt there is anyone around here who wants STEEM to go straight to hell...

Hey...you didn't just drop a phishing link did ya? :p :P Kidding of course :) I will sign up!

Thank for your input @shadowspub!

definitely not Phishing .. but am fishing for some great content to be created from the prompts :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 59590.12
ETH 2551.09
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.54