5 minute free writing by @suanky. Topic: A gift of the selfish variety
Fuente
It is not easy nowadays to define a true friendship. We know that a true friendship is built over time, a long time, even years, knowing the other person well and knowing much or enough about that person, that over the years you know how to identify if it is worth considering it within the family. There will be many friends, but few true friends. The only thing we keep are the good times, whether they are friends or true friends.
We can perhaps also have a brotherhood, where we climb beyond true friends, a true brotherhood, basically it would be like true friends, who are present at all times, in good times, in bad times, advising you for good, the transparency that has with you, that does not hide anything from you, that is honest with you, that within the jocularity has its limits, and above all that respects the friendship.
There are "friends" who act with gifts, a gift that perhaps at the moment you need it and swear absolute loyalty to you perhaps for a few years or a shorter time, but they do not always come with good intentions, that would be a gift of the selfish variety, anyone who comes to "buy" you with a gift and then extract everything they can from you for their own benefit. Unfortunately we can't always detect them, because they seem to come with good intentions and end up being poisonous.
They are those who see you with different eyes, who see that you need help, but they pretend to be blind, when you have a need and need help to solve problems in your life, but do not know what to advise you, or simply tell you, friend I would not know how to help you, but it is not about whether you know or not, find a way to help him, because he is your friend, then you know what those who claim to be your friends are all about.
Invito a: @rengus, @jjqf y @franmathey05
Hello friend!
I'm @steem.history, who is steem witness.
Thank you for witnessvoting for me.
please click it!
(Go to https://steemit.com/~witnesses and type fbslo at the bottom of the page)
50% plagiarism in this post.
When the detector detects plagiarism is personally check the link to to read the sources of the plagiarised statements.
https://game.dclick.io/posts/@wakeupkitty.pal/dirty-dog-that-terrible-voice
https://game.dclick.io/posts/@osamaparacha/5tetac-or-a-story-of-an-old-lady-or-a-short-love-story-or
https://game.dclick.io/posts/@suanky/5-minute-free-writing-by-suanky-topic-ticked-off
Above is the screenshot of the highlighted seemingly plagiarized statements and the links to which seem to be the sources of the plagiarism.
Checking those links the user didn't copy anything from any of them. So except there's something I'm not seeing the post isn't plagiarized. Besides the percentage is 26% NOT 50%.
I've just checked myself: Both tools I used found 26% plagiarism. However, when looking at the passages in question, I notice that they are common phrases that I would not explicitly consider intellectual property. We will discuss this in the team tomorrow, but I personally find nothing to object to at the moment.
@weisser-rabe
cc: @wase1234, @ridwant, @josevas217, @yousafharoonkhan