literature

Mythopoetic textual interpretation as a probable means to adecuate definition of literature seems in russian humanistic discipline within the 70-s on the crossroads of many paradigms of humanities. Sharing the fundamental options of poststructuralism, Mythopoetical criticism goes to use much some method orientations of up to date linguistics, philosophical theory and also the study of culture. This approach to text helps to explain the amount of deep linguistics that remains inaccesible for ancient literary history. Nevertheless, some traits of this method appear to be strange and doubtful, as a result of it chiefly chooses innovative way of interpretation. That’s why Mythopoetical criticism became terribly fruitful for several students of russian literature within their intentions to leave the obsolete schemes of analysis. The famous representatives of Mythopoetics are each in the Western scholarship (for example, Erzy Faryno, Wolf Schmid, Aage Hansen-Love, Igor Smirnov, Mikhail Weiskopf) and in the Russian (such as Vladimir Toporov as a precursor of the