Anzen Science Company (https://sci.zone/anzensci) is offering to pay researchers a sum of money for putting the names of clients who contributed nothing to the research as co-authors on peer-reviewed research papers, is it legitimate? 论文挂名服务

in NutBox3 years ago
Jeff Pinto, Business Professor at Pennsylvania State University

So basically, they are requesting that academics “ghost write” articles for their clients? Well, while this is an interesting business model, where real scholars are offered money to add the names of paying third parties to their author list, it is academic fraud, as several people here have noted. Basically, the rule of thumb is that if you had nothing to do with the paper or the study itself, you have no rights to having your name added to the authors’ list. The interesting side-bar here is that lots of universities interpret “contribution” in different ways. For some big B-Schools, they are invested in getting their doctoral students some visibility in the form of refereed journal articles, so they deliberately soften the contribution requirement. Simply conducting a literature search may be considered sufficient to get you a third or fourth-authorship on the submission. At other schools, if you didn’t contribute directly to the actual writing or stats analysis (in other words, if you did not make a genuinely substantive contribution), you might get an acknowledgement at the bottom of the title page, but that’s pretty much it.
所以基本上,他们要求学者为他们的客户“写”文章?嗯,虽然这是一个有趣的商业模式,真正的学者被提供资金以将付费第三方的名字添加到他们的作者名单中,但正如这里的一些人所指出的那样,这是学术欺诈。基本上,经验法则是,如果您与论文或研究本身无关,则您无权将您的名字添加到作者名单中。这里有趣的边栏是许多大学以不同的方式解释“贡献”。对于一些大的商学院,他们投资于以期刊论文的形式让他们的博士生获得一些知名度,所以他们故意放宽了贡献要求。简单地进行文献检索可能被认为足以让您获得提交的第三或第四作者身份。在其他学校,如果你没有直接为实际写作或统计分析做出贡献(换句话说,如果你没有做出真正实质性的贡献),你可能会在标题页的底部得到一个确认,但这很漂亮多啦。

Some people might argue that ghost-writing journal articles and adding a customer’s name is just the logical extension of a set of muddy co-authorship rules that commonly exist. I disagree for the simple reason that academic writing has never fostered a “pay to play” mindset. Do some people get their names put on papers that they had nearly nothing to do with? Definitely. Has it ever devolved into a business model and overtly commercialized practice before like the one described here? Not that I am aware of. It seems grossly unethical conduct.
有些人可能会争辩说,代写期刊文章和添加客户姓名只是一组普遍存在的泥泞合着规则的逻辑延伸。我不同意的原因很简单,学术写作从来没有培养“付费游戏”的心态。有些人是否将自己的名字写在几乎与他们无关的文件上?确实。它是否曾经像这里描述的那样演变成一种商业模式和公开的商业化实践?不是我所知道的。这似乎是非常不道德的行为。


Ramasamy Palaniappan, m.sc Research & Teaching, University of Madras (1977)

That's academic fraud, it's a crime, dishonest and it's intellectual theft, unethical, pl don't entertain, …some people seem to be involved, and also escape ..
那是学术欺诈,这是犯罪,不诚实,是智力盗窃,不道德,请不要娱乐,……有些人似乎参与其中,并且还逃脱了……



image.png

  • 林佑杰博士

  • 主要研究环糊精的生产与纯化技术

  • 在硕博士期间发表了七篇SCI国际期刊文章

  • 浙江大学 生物工程研究所 博士后

  • Dr Lin Yu Kiat

  • Research focus: Production and Purification of Cyclodextrins

  • 7 SCI Journal Papers during Postgrad

  • Postdoc, Bioengineering Institute, Zhejiang University

image.png

吴庆珂

  • 共同创始人
    上海盎真科技有限公司
    Jul 2020 - Present

山东济南
盎真科研,国际SCI科研合作,学术出版著作

中国 山东省 济南
国际科研合作,SCI文章发表,国际出版期刊、专著

  • 区域经理
    北京百迈客生物科技有限公司
    Jun 2014 - Dec 2016

北京
二代三代医学领域高通量测序技术服务

  • 中国林业科学研究院
    理学硕士分子生物学
    2011 - 2014

  • 山东师范大学
    理学学士生物技术
    2007 - 2011

Sort:  

witnesses vote for daily upvote. Thank you for your support,Voting for me. vote
link: https://steemit.com/~witnesses or https://steemitwallet.com/~witnesses type in boylikegirl.wit and click VOTE

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64222.08
ETH 3135.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.99