✨Glitter Finance FAQs & Discussions✨ Glitter Finance常见问题&讨论 [Sook Jin GOH]
✨ About Glitter Finance || 關於 Glitter Finance ✨
The vision of Glitter Finance is to increase capital efficiency between cross-chain bridges, by re-deploying synthetic assets created by the Glitter cross-chain bridge, into yield pools integrated into the Glitter Finance Platform.
✨ 🪙🔗🌉🔗🪙 ✨
A cross-chain bridge bridging multiple L1 ecosystems including Algorand, Solana, Terra, Polygon and Cudos.
📈🤖⚙️📈
Incorporating AI and machine learning in the Glitter Finance Platform will create an algorithmic trading platform, which will help novice traders.
🌱 Please follow our social media and channels 請在各大社媒頻道上關注我們：
Telegram： https://t.me/GlitterFinanceCN （中） https://t.me/joinchat/bn0aKLM-OSY0NTMx （EN）
Twitter： http://twitter.com/GlitterFinanceC （中） http://twitter.com/GlitterFinance （EN）
Official Page：http://glitterfinance.org
Facebook: https://facebook.com/GlitterFinance
LinkedIn： https://www.linkedin.com/company/glitter-finance
Instagram： https://t.co/YLOwrZphlu?amp=1
🪙Glitter Finance $XGLI Token 代幣🪙
Total Supply總量: 500,000,000 (375,000,000 @ Solana + 125,000,000 @ Algorand)
Token Standard代幣標準:
Algorand Standard Assets (ASA), ID: 607591690
Solana Program Library (SPL)
Real-time Data 實時數據: CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko,
CEX: Bibox,
DEX: Tinyman,
FAQs
Contract?
Contract Address
XGLI (Algorand): https://algoexplorer.io/asset/607591690
XGLI (Solana): https://solscan.io/token/FsPncBfeDV3Uv9g6yyx1NnKidvUeCaAiT2NtBAPy17xg
xSOL (Algorand): https://algoexplorer.io/asset/792313023
xALGO (Solana): https://solscan.io/token/xALGoH1zUfRmpCriy94qbfoMXHtK6NDnMKzT4Xdvgms
Tinyman algo
https://app.tinyman.org/#/swap?asset_in=0&asset_out=607591690
https://tinychart.org/asset/607591690
CoinMarketCap: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/glitter-finance/
Where to Trade $XGLI
You can trade XGLI at:
CEXs
Bibox (Support Algorand and Solana chains) @BiboxExchangeEnglish: https://www.bibox.com/en/exchange/basic/XGLI_USDT
Bitrue @BitrueOfficial: https://www.bitrue.com/trade/xgli_usdt
Algorand DEXs
Tinyman @tinymanofficial: https://tinychart.org/asset/607591690
Solana DEXs
@CropperFinance: https://cropper.finance/swap
Where can we stake XGLI?
Currently there are three platforms for XGLi staking and farming:
- AlgoStake
XGLI staking: https://app.algostake.org
XGLI/Algo LP (Tinyman) Farming: https://app.algostake.org
XGLI Staking: https://cropper.finance/staking
XGLI/SOL LP Farming: https://cropper.finance/farms
- Bitrue
XGLI Staking: https://www.bitrue.com/yield-farming/
Stake BTR Earn XGLI: https://www.bitrue.com/yield-farming/
Additionally, you may earn XGLI by staking YLDY or farming YLDY/XGLI LP @Yieldly
Stake YLDY Earn XGLI: https://app.yieldly.finance/pools?id=786777082
XGLI/YLDY LP Farming: https://app.yieldly.finance/liquidity-pools?id=786781576
XGLI Chart
Sites that provide charts for $XGLI :
CoinMarketCap: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/glitter-finance/
CoinGecko: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/glitter-finance
Bibox: https://www.bibox.com/en/exchange/basic/XGLI_USDT
Tinyman: https://tinychart.org/asset/607591690
More CEX Listing
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/92192
Until we put a baseline of stability into this, we will not move forward with any further CEX listings
Why was the name changed from Glitter Finance to Glitter?
The CEO has decided to move away from the Finance label:
- everyone calls themselves finance in DeFi, and so it's banal
- "finance" is not a convenient term in terms of regulators, bc we do not want to give an impression of competing with banks
- we are an ecosystem not just one protocol
so Glitter makes more sense
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107667
How much in the treasury have we got and funding please ??
we haven't touched much of what's in the treasury
as far as runway from investment, I would say (in general terms as this is company information and is internal), that we have enough runway to ride out the bear market and launch mainnet, and bring solana distribution tool also to mainnet and in general launch quite a few products just based on the old raise
I will also underline, that my current calculations do not factor in using the token treasury or even revenue
so assuming there is no revenue and we never touch the token, we will still ride out the bear market
as it is - the team is both lean and highly functional, we do not have the kind of burn rate per month as one would expect from a company our size
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107612
Why create a new blockchain for Glitter?
At first, it fully decentralises the bridge, solves fully centralization issue
After, it allows us to build a cross chain liquidity hub, with the aim of automation of defi trading and streamlining it to normal (not crypto based) end users
This was always the goal of Glitter
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107637
What is Glitter's Layer 1 blockchain based on?
COSMOS.
COSMOS allows for high level interoperability with a finished framework for layer 1 creation
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107650
Polkadot has both parachains and parathreads but would put us in a position where we have to expend and raise a lot of capital just to guarantee a slot for 2 years and have to do that all over again 2 years later. It's a great ecosystem but not fit for purpose. Capital is better deployed building and incentivizing!
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107654
Add Liquidity
We added liquidity - and then people dumped
If people dump, and don't care about the token and the community, that is not the fault of the team
We can add liquidity from now to kingdom come
If people just want to sell, and don't actually care about the project, then nothing will help the token
Right now the token is very vulnerable because our technology is not out yet
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/91542
Raydium
Current plan is to add liquidity to Raydium after the Algorand ↔ Solana Bridge is out on Mainnet. Nevertheless, please wait for official announcement to confirm :)
Regarding listing on KuCoin and Huobi
https://t.me/GlitterTradersUnofficial/2052
I sent this information out before any deal was finalized and due diligence was finished. I will not go into details here what happened, but I will say that, that is my fault, and I should have made it very clear we would not be listing on these exchanges.
Has $XGLI been verified?
Yes it has been verified by AlgoExplorer and Solscan.
Are Clawback and Freeze functions enabled for $XGLI?
No, Clawback and Freeze functions have been disabled for $XGLI.
Why has the supply of XGLI tokens increased to 500M?
The tokenomics were updated in line with our advisor's suggestions, to reflect the increased value of the project, and allow us to fully build the product. Tokenomics were changed to reflect the changed scope of the project.
Claim $XGLI
Claim portal has been disabled and future XGLI vesting tokens will be airdropped to IDO investors on 22nd every month unless we notify otherwise.
To claim 1st and/or 2nd vesting, please DM any of the moderators with the following information:
- your wallet address
- VC/Institution you invested with
- which vesting (1st and/or 2nd) do you wish to claim
Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107335
Community Discussions 社区讨論
Reddit:
When the Glitter Finance "Algo - Solana" bridge goes live, expect alot of Sol holders to move to Algorand
The community persuaded Glitter Finance to remove freeze and clawback from their XGLI token! Sometimes it does pay to get involved and voice concerns in a constructive way
Facebook Post: https://www.facebook.com/groups/Algorand/permalink/1037908550151136/
Stake YLDY Earn XGLI
As promised, I looked through the yieldly telegram group for any discussion of Glitter, and people are indeed generally very positive about it there, and pleased to be able to stake their YLDY to get it. Overall they seem to view it as a quality project (rightfully of course!), perhaps even the best yieldly has had.
This suggests to me that good awareness and positivity has come from the Yieldly deal. But it doesn't mean I think the deal should be renewed when the pools end in 30 days. Cos ultimately I think the good has come already, and renewal would just be giving more free tokens to yieldly holders for little additional benefit to Glitter.
My opinion (for what it's worth!) might change if yieldly pulled in a lot of new holders (meaning greater additional exposure) or proposed a deal that would directly require more XGLI buying rather than the current deal of yieldly holders receiving it for free (which naturally they are pleased about and would love to see extended).
All in all the feeling about Glitter in the Algorand community seems to be way more positive than it once was (when there was all the FUD going around after the launch months ago). I'm talking in general now, not just about in yieldly circles, though the yieldly deal may have helped this a lot. When the bridge launches I'm confident it will be received with great enthusiasm 😊
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107854
Told you the Yieldly community loved Glitter. 😎😁
I swapped a bunch of Yieldly so that I was 50/50 for the LP, and now that I'm swapping by Yieldly rewards back to Glitter, XGLI is now a bigger bag than Yieldly!
Super excited for the bridge. Solana is a great ecosystem to connect with. However, I'm way more excited about the bridge to Cosmos. Algorand and Cosmos are the two ecosystems I research and am most heavily invested in, so that connection is going to be epic!
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/107881
I disagree. I’m a large Yieldly holder who has staked for Glitter since day 1 and haven’t sold. In fact, I actually bought more Glitter after close examination of team and use. I am plugged into the Yieldly community and many people who are staking Yieldly for Glitter haven’t sold and have every intention of holding.
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/108061
That is good to hear. The Yieldly stakers who hold their XGLI rewards are better for XGLI investors than those who dump them, but it's the ones who actually take the extra step of buying more XGLI who are the real success story, and the primary point of the whole arrangement I believe. I suspect that they are the minority but it is awesome that you are one of them 😊
It would be great to see an analysis that worked out real numbers. The chart of token price since the Yieldly pool started shows a pattern - and it's not positive - but there are other factors that affect that of course - I can't say with confidence that yieldly stakers have, en masse, caused that. Also I appreciate that there are benefits to increasing the number of XGLI holders and raising awareness of the project in general - it's not all about directly stimulating buying. However, when the pool ends in 26 days, I can't see how doing it all again for the benefit of the same yieldly holders really helps XGLI further.
It's not my decision though, obviously, I am just volunteering my unasked-for opinion. Since I've made the same point a few times now I think I'd better stop talking about it 😄 But thank you for responding - I appreciate the discussion and hearing from another YLDY staker who has not just held their XGLI rewards but also bought more.
https://t.me/GlitterFinanceGlobal/108093
発佈人
Sook Jin GOH,
Community Manager 社群經理 @ Glitter.Finance ,
Regional Ambassador for Malaysia 馬來西亞區域大使 @ Nutbox.io ,
CEO @ Nanyang Global Scientific Research Centre 南洋國際科研中心
Upvoted! Thank you for supporting witness @jswit.
