You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Mini Crypto Program Part 3 || "Understanding of Blockchain", by @steemtopus, 10% to steem.education
Dear @steemtopus ,
Thank you for participating in this Mini Crypto program, I really appreciate your good intentions and your efforts in understanding our practice this time.
| Understanding the topic | |
| Compliance with Topic | |
| Clarity of Language | |
| Quality of Analysis | |
| Markdownstyle | |
| Plagiarism | |
| Grand total |
You didn't mention how a block works and how the data we write in the block becomes valid or invalid.
you have good understanding about blockchain, but You didn't explain about blockchain detail.
This learning will greatly benefit you to be in Crypto Academy later, because we are in cryptocurrency-based social media, and Cryptocurrency is in blockchain technology.
Don't repeat the same words too much.
Thank you very much, we will waiting for your next exercise, and we will waiting you at the season 4 of Crypto Academy. 👍💪
Has been assessed by;
@liasteem
@steem.education
The first point you listed is not correct. It was actually written in my post.
And i don't think there is anything wrong with my markdown styling to get an half mark.
Getting 0.1 for originality is actually out of it. You could do a plagiarism text and show me the result
Repaeating the same word?, i dont think so
Don't you think you are being to strict with your assesment. My friends said it is not this strict in crypto academy. If a preparatory class is this hard, don't you think we might lose actual confidence and self believe to partake in the academy?.
I am appealing for some changes in the system. I will be glad to hear back from you @liasteem.
And don't forget the booming support for my post. Thank you again