SEC S9W5 | Seeing is believing" versus "Knowing is believing"
"Seeing is believing" versus "Knowing is believing"
Introduction
Hello friends of Steemit and especially to my friends of thisSTEEM FOR BETTERLIFE, this time I bring you the topic "Seeing is believing" versus "Knowing is believing" . In this opportunity I am going to stick to the questions created by the designers of this contest, since the contest is oriented towards the perception and opinion about these two sentences.
Interpretation of these two previous expressions.
The first expression, to see in order to believe, I consider it to be of less convincing force than the expression to know in order to believe. The position that an individual should have, will depend on the multiple characteristic factors that may be present in the individual, such as empiricism, idiosyncrasy, paradigms and ancestral influences of the individual. In my particular case, I consider that my preference is based on my formation as a university student, since I recognize that as an individual, my perception through my senses is limited in the face of knowing in order to believe, which is linked to the internal power of the subconscious in the pineal gland.
An Example of "Seeing is Believing" versus "Knowing is Believing".
There are many examples, but I am going to base this on my experience of seeing where others cannot see. I believe that this is due to the ability that I was able to acquire through Mathematical Logic, that taken to daily life, allows me to reach great levels of analytical skills in many different situations. In the past I had a political opinion column in a national newspaper, where I was ahead of many unforeseen situations, both for Tyrians and Trojans, which led me to withdraw when I received threats by mail from both sides.
What is the moral message that can be extracted from this expression?
There is an expression that I always use, which comes from the bible itself but which refers to the truth in which by itself does not lead us to be free and in another passage refers to knowledge. Both positions alone, do not lead us to freedom; but if we join both expressions and it is from an unknown author "Only Truth and Knowledge makes us free"; as in my opinion the two visions of this subject must go together, I would express it "Seeing and knowing in order to believe".
Thank you friends for reading this post and I invite you to know my blog , where I have made, many post, where I always leave in some way or another a content of both visions on this subject, and as always, I hope to have contributed in the awakening of humanity, I invite the following friends @mini80, @Angelys and @alegnita to participate in this contest.
Logro-1, Logro-2, Logro-3, logro-4, lofro 5 parte 1, lofro 5 parte 2, logro5-parte 3
By mistake in the drop down beneficiary burnsteem25, I put, burnsteem25 instead of null; so my post was cancelled giving an error, that's why I had to post again the same post. As I am still in the training stage, I forgot how this beneficiary is made. Thanking you in advance for your understanding. Greetings.
Sabes? me parece muy interesante e inteligente de tu parte tu conclusión que ambas expresiones deberían juntarse para llevarnos a la verdad, que realmente es la que nos da la libertad; "ver y saber para creer", me parece tan estupendo como tu participación. Exito en tu entrada.
Es por eso que lo plasmo en mi animación gif de entrada del post. Si nos ponemos del lado opuesto de ambas sentencias; es caer en dogmas y fanatismo. Por ejemplo, si creo en que todo está predestinado, puedo cruzar la calle sin mirar a ningún lado y si además no sé que un carro puede venir en ese momento y me atropella; lo más seguro es que me mate. Saludos.