Why is it not possible to love different persons equally ??
.jpeg)
Can you share your love equally between several persons ??
Haven't you notice how imposible it is to do so??
You may be considering why it is not possible to love equally .
Wouldn't you please advance reasons for this human phenomenon??
It is possible, it's called polyamory. I personally have four boyfriends, all of them loving equally.
There are cultures where you can have many wives, polygamist Arabic cultures
There are cultures where you can have many husbands, polyandry, like in some parts of Tibet
There is humanistic version which allows to have many partners of any gender, like polyamory - quite popular in some places (in Canada 5% of citizens describe themselves polyam).
Even monoamoric people who decide to live with someone else often declare they didn't stop loving their previous husband or wife.
Marriages is a cultural concept, widely influenced by the religions. In fact, before we all were polyam. Native tribes used to create very complicated relationship nets.
Polyandry , Polyam and Monoamorphic are strange to me because they have not been publicly accepted 8nnmy part if the world!
You have indeed schooled me adequately on different types of marital relationship!
It may not be accepted by some cultures but it doesn't make it less valid :) sure, not everything is for everyone and monoamoric relations (with one person only) are as valid as any other, so it's okay to not be opened for multiple love, but it's not the only possible form of family around the world.
Question "why is it not possible to love different people equally?"would sound better when it would be rephrased to "why most people choose to not love many different people equally?" Or "why in some places it's not accepted to love many different people equally?". It's more respectful that way.
Have a great day! Wishing you all the best ;)
I think my question is misunderstood. I meant "LOVING DIFFERENT PERSONS EQUALY devoid of marital/sexual affiliations as found in Father / Children relationship.
Nevertheless, in matrimonial relationship , NATURE ought to teach us the best , which is obviously female/male relationship.
There are over 1500 species with homosexual relationships, besides that some animals changes their gender according to the environment they stay in. There are also living organisms with both genders or no gender at all. We have animals which connects into couples for whole their lives and another which changes partners multiple times or even creates the polygamic(hippo, lions), polyandric groups (Actinopterygii).
There is no one ultimate nature recipe for the appropriate sex neither appropriate love.
Humans are the highest class in the Animalia kingdom ! Does ALL said above applies to the MAMMALS which the Homo sapiens belong??
Nature ABSOLUTELY predisposes humans for heterosexual relationship, by the structure of the genitalia and hormones as they were endowed preconception!
Yes; there could be some infinitesimal aberrations which should be subjected to necessary attention as sicknesses are medically addressed , not accepted as the ideal.
Yes, all of that applies to mammals. In fact, there is much more homosexuality between mammals than any other group of animals.
Supremacy of mammals is very egoistic and wrong. I believe some religions may want you believe so, but from scientific point of view, we are all made of the same stardust and we all mean equally nothing in the cosmos.
Genitalia is not Lego. It doesn't matter where it fits. It fits in a hole in a warm pudding cake, so what? What's the point?
Hormones works differently for some people, otherwise some sexual orientations wouldn't exist.
You just called me sick, buddy. In that moment conversation starts to be against of the steemit rules. Sick is the homophobia, by the way present in nature only in human kind. Sick is also the ignorance which makes you believe in the things your religion says instead of reading about the facts, I am trying to explain you in the comments.
Nice talking, not doing to continue it. Sorry for your ignorance
Hello @papi.mati
By "SICK" I meant being unhealthy like being sick diseases like Malaria , Typhoid , Cancer etc . These conditions are available , but not normal , hence they are therapeutically addressed !
I didn't know you beyond this media , thus I couldn't have known you as "sick " . I never meant that and it should be so taken as every other insinuation is should not be seen as mine , but as deemed by whoever !!
By nature , genitalia and every organ is for defined function. The legs for movement , hands for clasping , heart for blood circulation etc !
Similarly , genitalia is primarily for PROCREATION !
Its been worthwhile discussing with you , but may I opine that we should strive to be less controversial, more accommodating and less assertive of our idiosyncrasies . I have learnt much from you ; and would want to learn much more !
I hope you will not deny me such opportunity!
Good day !!