RE: The problem of curation window !
Hi @clixmoney
Interesting choice of topic. Showing me this issue from very different point of view.
That's why also you need to be consistent.
You nailed it! One hell of a solid advise.
But, I think there is a problem in the curation windown anyway. I think it's better to reward more those who find undervalued content and support it to expose the highest quality to the blockchain. I think that will incentivize everyone to create better content rather than post anything to be upvoted well
I'm still unsure what would you suggest instead of current solution?
Also I've noticed that you've applied to become part of "Community Curators Program". I dropped my supportive comment here: https://steemit.com/the100daysofsteem/@project.hope/qavxng
Hope it will help.
ps. Are you planning to cross-post this article to HIVE? if not then I will gladly drop an solid upvote from @steemcurator06
Yours, Piotr
The solution is to make that window bigger, like half hour or more to give time to curators to find better content.
Don't you think @clixmoney that it would change much? People would still carry on with their auto-upvoting as usual
I know. It's also not up to me to change the system. I just say my opinion about things knowing that they will not do that for long term to have more people. I think for some here it's better to be in the same circle here and no bodyu care that much about inviting people. But, I know that I can do the right thing and if everyone will start to do the right thing and to not care about the abuse happening, maybe it will be a bit better, but never perfect.