Photographs.

It is clear that the hadiths quoted at the stage of portrait making and portrait making are all about portraits, which are engraved or which are drawn by hand. But the matter of the image taken with the help of the camera door reflection is completely new. This photography did not exist in the time of Rasool Kareem. The question here is, do the laws that have been quoted about portraits and portrait makers apply to this photography?

All these scholars think that it is haraam to make portraits with full body, according to them there is nothing wrong with photography, especially when it is incomplete.

Like other scholars, the question at that stage is, are these reflective pictures equivalent to the pictures that the artist draws himself with his brush? Or in some hadiths as stated as ‘Illat’ (Reason): Does the portrait maker resemble the creation of Allah, is it not present in photography? And in the eyes of fiqh-philosophy, when there is no 'Illat' (Reason), then there is no hookah-nitres on its basis. (That is, when there is no similarity, it cannot be haram.)

At this stage, the fatwa issued by the late Mufti of Egypt Shaykh Muhammad Bakhit is very clear. He writes: Photographs taken with the help of photography - which are made possible by special reflection of light - are not included in the portrait, which has been banned. Because the type of portraits that are forbidden to be created is in the context of inventing and creating portraits, which are not present or created before, which are similar to any living thing created by God as a result of spelling. But the photos taken with the help of the camera do not fall at that stage.