Well, I think your project is cool but you did not put in some consideration.

Loyalty: Rotating such position will just give way to unserious author because we are trying to get new country representative. In the years, before the steemit team launched application for CR, they actually contact the author by dropping a comment. I think this was done in consideration of the author loyalty to the platform.

Longevity: I personally believed that this goes with experience, there is no way I will want to compete with authors who joined the platform in 2017 and hold a reputation of over 70. We all know what it means to build such reputation, meaning they were devoted to the platform.

The steemit team delegated 5k SP to CR, so if a CR power down, the steemit team will just undelegate. So I will rather suggest it should be delegated to another loyal steemian.

Changing hands will not help to grow because this is not an organization. You looking at the steemit platform as organisations, trying to apply democratic principles.

If a CR is unavailable on the platform, the 5k sp should be undelegated and assigned to another loyal steemian.

Rotation will just give way authors to apply for CR, serve for one year as you proposed and power down the next year they are not selected. Now by the end of 12 months not being a CR, they prepare and Claim to be serious and apply again and get support. The circle will continue like that.

To be CR doesn’t change you as a human and have challenges, so I don’t think breaking along the line should not be a point to apply rotatory system. I know reputable steemians which I think their reputation tells all about them and should not be water down by stripping off their CR status just to make it rotatory.