You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Turning Beneficiaries into a More Powerful Feature
Ive seen that idea that you are deploying and think its cool. Now, in order to actually give the rewards to the author as you claim you should set @likwid as beneficiary, then send the rewards to the author, for as things stand you are keeping half of the author rewards.....
What? How do you mean?
oops, my mistake, mental lapsus, sorry.
I’ve never noticed this behavior using beneficiary splits. Those percentages apply to both the liquid and non liquid portions of author rewards I’m 99% sure. One interesting artifact/glitch that I’ve noticed in Condenser is the author rewards disappearing completely from the displayed value tally post payout. When setting 100% of awards to another beneficiary, when payout concludes you’ll see the post value cut in half and the author rewards displayed as $0.
Yea, just checked to confirm, but when you set a beneficiary it counts both. Thank goodness because that would be so much more of a pain.
