Potential Fascists
Just recently I've heard repeated that Hitler was a socialist, this time by YouTube "big idea superstar" Dave Rubin. So, was Hitler a socialist? The short and correct answer to this question is NO. If you're a regular reader you already know this. Using this knowledge, and attempting to place it in our times, the following statement is also true: if Hitler were alive today in America, he would be a Republican.
source: Wikimedia Commons
.jpg){kind=link}
Rubin, who honestly isn't the brightest light among the grifters in the so called Intellectual Dark Web, used the simplest argument to validate this opinion; he reminded listeners of the fact that "Nazi" is an acronym for National SOCIALIST German Workers Party... It's always amazing to me how so many people (the IDW has hundreds of millions of followers) seem to be unable to penetrate the third dimension and stay stuck in these simplistic two-dimensional thought-patterns, black and white worldviews. What's also amazing is that, not only in America but also western European countries where far-right populists have risen to power, people always seem to be confident in thinking that what happened in Nazi Germany will NEVER happen to them. Well, don't be so confident; after the Second World War and during the Nuremberg trials, the world was very curious to learn how what happened in Germany was possible. How could an entire people support and fight for a genocidal maniac like Hitler? Surely there had to be something wrong psychologically with these people, at the very least with the leadership. Well, you may be surprised to know that, even among the most murderous leaders, psychologists couldn't find anything wrong with them; they were people like you and me. And the same goes for the millions that followed their commands; this first video gives an in-depth explanation of how Germany itself for decades tried to cope with what happened, and how till this day the question "Was Every German Soldier Bad?" is not answered to everyone's satisfaction...
Was Every German Soldier Bad? - A Response
With all that in mind, let's now again focus on America and its steady descent into ever more open fascism under Trump. There are many psychologists who have for decades tried to find common personality traits among those who are prone to throw their support behind a strong fascist leader. Who are these people? Are they liberal or conservative? Religious or atheists? What are their likes and dislikes? Don't get me wrong here, s in the end I believe that under the "right" circumstance ANYONE can be lured to the Dark Side, so to speak. And there is no fool-proof profile to be had for people who most certainly will fall for the rhetoric of a fascist strong man. Nevertheless I'd invite you to watch the below linked video with the title "How to Spot a (Potential) Fasc!st: The Authoritarian Personality Explained"; it might help you to identify for yourself if the traits discussed within apply to yourself or people you know. I got the impression that the profile for "fascisticus potentialicus" nicely matches what I imagine to be an everyday conservative. Fascism indeed plays on nostalgia and a romanticized view of a lost past that needs to be regained or protected, and always fights against progressive forces that advocate "new" norms, for example a distinction between sex and gender which is sure to madden your run-of-the-mill religious conservative...
How to Spot a (Potential) Fasc!st: The Authoritarian Personality Explained
Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep safe, keep healthy!
Recent articles you might be interested in:
| Latest article >>>>>>>>>>> | Cultural Evangelicalism |
|---|---|
| Déjà Vu | A Rock And A Hard Place |
| Biden: Not There Yet! | White Fragility |
| Hyper-Realist Takeover | Ultimate Villain |
Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas.
@zyx066, ummmm, well, uhhh, in a kind of remote way, I guess you could say that "Hitler was a socialist" although, to be really honest about it, he carried it a bit far, like Lenin, Stalin and Chairman Mao. The reason I mention the other superguys is that at one point, they all read a book from a not very popular Author, Karl Marx. In this one book, he wrote something very familiar, "that the whole should take care of all it;s parts, and that all the parts MUST serve the whole". This was also the beginning of a explanation in "Blackstone's Principallia of Law". Most of Karl Marx's writings was about everyone owning everything, and that there could be NO mega-wealthy. It kinda made sense, but the people who wrote the news, even back then, saw their wealth going away and began calling Marx a "Marxist/Communist" as he believed that the wealth should be held by the "Community". interesting thought, and unfortunately, misinterpreted.
If you ever get the chance, check out some of his writings. Also, my hero, Eugene V. Debs (American Socialist Party) who also ran for President 5 times on the American Socialist platform. Mitch, out
As always, thanks so much for the response, and as always, sorry for my late reaction @mitch94541... I have to disagree though with the whole "Hitler was a socialist" of some sorts; he wasn't, not even remotely. Before he started murdering any other groups, he first killed all the socialists and communists; he hated them even more than he hated the Jews. Also, he presided over the kind of crony capitalism we now call "socialism for the rich".. So, no, not every authoritarian is automatically a socialist or communist, not even Stalin or Mao.