The most terrifying thing in the world is not a barbarian, but a very selfish person with "high education".

In your opinion, what is the biggest difference between a barbarian and a civilized person? Is it culture, education, or ability?

Actually no. The biggest difference between a barbarian and a civilized person is character.

Barbarians are primitive people, they don't know what is good and what is bad, and they will use all means to survive and not be attacked by wild beasts.

Civilized people will pay attention to social morality, family morality, and personal morality, and they will always differentiate between interests and interests, and will not violate bottom lines and principles on certain matters.

However, in contemporary society, we find that most people have entered a blind spot, that is, as long as people understand a little of the culture and get something other people don't understand, they will be highly educated people with a degree certificate.

It can be said that this kind of thinking is more one-sided.

There is a saying that political ability and integrity are supreme values, virtue and lack of talent are inferior products, incompetence and lack of virtue are waste products, and talent and lack of virtue are dangerous products.

It goes without saying that they have political ability and integrity, they have the feeling of "strengthening the world at the same time". The most terrible are those who are talented but not virtuous.

These people, they have read many books and studied many cultures, but they do not have a "big love" heart. They will always choose to do things for their own benefit in an immoral way, and even lead to personal "involvement." situation.

These people are "highly educated" selfish people and the most terrifying "barbarian" culture in the world.

Most people will ask, what is "extraordinarily selfish"?

Here, we can see it from two aspects, one is "exquisiteness", and the other is "selfishness".

Subtlety is the opposite of "vulgarity". People who are "classy" have their own pursuits in life, their goals are ambitious, and their needs abound.

What about "egoism"? Namely doing everything for your own sake, even if it is detrimental to the interests of others, hypocrites become "hypocrites" don't hesitate.

If people don't have many cultures, then they definitely can't be "beautiful". But if people have culture, but there are deviations of ideology and morality, then these people will be promoted to be "selfish".

Just like some of the students in the ivory tower, they are mature and sophisticated, good at acting, good at forming groups, and know how to use other people's grades to help them rise to the top.

These people, they look totally nerdy on the face, but secretly, they do bad things that no one else can deny.

The so-called "one set for the face and one set for the back" refers to this "selfish" with a certain level of education.

Don't think that extravagant selfishness is only on campus, they are just students, maybe they are by your side, maybe there are people like that in your work.

In fact there are many talented but unscrupulous people in this society.

I have read a report that some 985 college students would not hesitate to trap competitors around them for little scholarships, and even dig holes for those around them, even if they tarnished other people's reputations.

There are also some professionals who have very high levels of education and possess wisdom and talents that no one else has. But they are not using it in the right way, but in the wrong way. They do not hesitate to take the sideline and satisfy themselves with the suffering of others.

In fact, this is the norm for some in today's society.

Many will say, why do these "high-quality" selfish people show up so often? This is related to school education.

Since ancient times, society has really attached great importance to education. However, this emphasis was tied to "promoting officials and making a profit."

When score theory becomes the norm in social education, then humans will be reduced to a means of assessment, without thinking, without morality, and just blind scores.

Because the culture they learn is cold, the advice given by the teacher is also cold. No teacher will teach you the enthusiasm of character.

Why? Because the exam is not available. But what they don't know is that what is needed will often exacerbate the crisis between people. What is not used is the most useful to people.

Highly educated egoists are not one person, but a group of people, even passed down from generation to generation.

One netizen complained that the teacher would be indifferent in class to the subject, and would use the students as free labor, and even if these students made mistakes, they would all speak ill.

These netizens were very disgusted. In his view, the teacher should teach students sincerely, rather than be very negative selfishness to cultivate people's wealth.

Just imagine, not even a teacher could be talented and virtuous, let alone a student without experience?

What Confucius valued most in ancient times was being a good example to others, and being taught without distinction. Teachers want to make friends with students and learn from each other, not one side is on top while the other side can only be humble.

In this way, both will result in a cycle. When the humble one becomes a teacher, he will do the same as the former.

Then, subtle egoism will never end. And these "highly educated" people were nothing more than savages.

Sometimes the scholars don't even fit in with a generation of uncultured dog slaughter. This is the sadness of the cold cultural heritage and the sorrow of society.