Vote Bot - Not Real Value of Blogging

Wow, I am amazed by the short post that earns high votes of value. I try to check some of the voters are bot. The author buys votes by sending some steam or sbd. Some of the authors buy some tokens. The system allows all authors to earn vote bots. However, the value of the posts is not real.

This post is to call for stem curators to look for the best contents. Contents that have good in quality and proved to be original deserve the highest votes.

I am not very comfortable with bot votes. All can earn high votes but how much the fee to pay the votes. Then steem is not a blogging platform but money games. When users earn profit from buying votes, they will repeat the actions. In fact, 100 $ should send more than 80 % liquid steem or SBD. So, It is profitable? yes, and users will play the game not bring the value of blogging content.

Another voting system that I want to criticize is the contest. There are too many contests. The contests are with the same titles. They look like spam postings. Besides that, the participants of the contests expect votes from steemit official curators. I do not like contests. I do not have freedom to post.

I think some of you will be irritated by this post but it is ok. I just ask for big power accounts to curate original contents that not use bot voting. It is ok you do not vote my post but I will keep posting to criticise the voting system. I hope account booster can be a community that gives the best votes for original contents. Contents that bring value and educate the members. $200 value of vote with zero engagement. Is that real value? Let's be real and bring value to account booster community with original contents.