No! I do not think so. It is perogative on us to make top5 participants as winners, and this was simply demostrated without ambiguity. I would have had a rethink if those mentioned had scored lower marks than you expressed.

Or are you insinuating that all those with 9.2 score should be listed as winners irrespective how many they are?

I beg your pardon. I do not expect this line of thought. Other quality posts and participants with good grades also matter. It shouldn't have been you before it is ideal.

Regards...