Thank you brother for your response,,

Steemians of course have their own problems with their economic status so for that reason they are forced to lose their club status.

Agreed that every person has financial problems for different reasons so many of them are forced to lose clubs against their will. But some are also taking chances that we can never directly put our finger on. And to be honest it is happening.

We've all probably seen users power down Steem and then withdraw everything and power up again the following month to participate in club5050 and then get booming support and the usual small curator support.

Like me, who no longer has a club due to economic pressures. But I don't do actions like farming steem. The impact I feel is that posts will not be curated by big curators. But what is unfair is when there is a steemian who does not power up by allowing the balance in the account to be added to the SBD balance which is quite large and he is still with club100 status.

It can be seen that the big curator sc01 account does not have the opportunity to curate general posts outside of SR report posts, top selected posts and engagement challenge winners. And in the case of sc02 it can be observed that maximum 25 to 30 accounts can be voted on daily but the problem here is that the amount of curating on different accounts daily is very less. And no matter which club one belongs to, he must power up the money earned within a month according to the club otherwise he has not used the club fully. In that case, the club is more likely to lose.

The basic question, will the amount of 500 steem disbursed affect the price of steem on the market? Or have we ever done research on the impact of powerdown on the price of Steem in the market?

I can't say how much steam users are powering up or powering down in a day, week or month. Of course, if it was known, it might be understood whether it actually works.

In my opinion, only big players are able to make the price of Steem go up or down. Then is Club 100 status guaranteed to get up votes from the curator? Of course not for the classic reason, content quality. What about steemians who have SP above 10k steem, they will definitely get up votes and definitely not because of the quality of the content but the quantity of steem.

I think a curator is attracted to both those with more SP and quality posters. But now I think one ideal club is to provide quality support. In this case one can independently power up all or remain in the club as per the issued club, it is their own decision.

those who don't have a club but Steemit has become a part of their life, they will certainly look for a community that doesn't question club status in every contest they make, such as the BoysLikeGirls Club and several other communities.

I think it's up to them how they handle it. The Steemit team is always trying to bring something good to the growth of Steemit so that everyone can benefit from it. So we as an author can only limit ourselves to follow their rules and share our pros and cons and the rest is their decision.