You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Did the Secretary of the Army Correct a Lt. Gen. in Real Time to Convert "Going Through it Lite" to Allergies?
Person A's death doesn't have 2 be mutually exclusive 2 person B's health problems. Proving that person B is the cause of Person A's death is impossible in a situation where there is an "airborne virus."
Good point, perhaps in the future they could narrow down the exact micro-mutations of each individual infection in order to determine exactly who infected who (it sounds like a good premise for an episode of black-mirror).
And you're right, people don't usually die from "one thing".
It's usually an accumulation of a lifetime's worth of "bad decisions".
So, if I get cancer from eating hot-dogs and ham and bologna (all known carcinogens) are my parents murderers? What about Oscar-Mayer? Are they murderers?
Exactly, or is it the manufacturer of the sodium nitrate? Or should the USDA be held accountable because they determine the allowable amount of nitrite that can be added to cured meats.
Don't you think that all known carcinogens should (at a minimum) be labeled with a prominent warning label, just like tobacco products?
Tough to say, cancer is tricky. I've half the mind that most of it comes from the SV40 virus in past vaccines and is passed down from generation to generation. Perhaps some of the carcinogens cause the virus to move from dormant to active. Cancer is kind of a big mystery in many ways.
Interesting side note, did you know that elephants are immune to cancer?
I do now!
"Elephants' cells contain 40 copies of a major cancer-suppressing gene called p53, two teams of scientists report. Humans have just two – one from each parent. The gene helps damaged cells repair themselves or self-destruct when exposed to cancer-causing substances."
So, repair or apoptosis. I'm sure if it wasn't
such a booming industry we'd have figured
out the cure for ourselves by now. It's prob
been done by now, we just aren't made privy.
FREE-MARKET = RENT-SEEKING (monopolistic and subscription based model)
Self-interest is something that is never sated.
People will always do what is in their best in
that regard. Some to the point of satisfiying
basic needs, some to the point of abject greed.
Regardless, without free market and the normal
self-interest which runs it. You'll have a non-free
market and get confronted with the knowledge
problem. People in the free market tend to take
the knowledge problem for granted because we
fail to imagine the hows and why of it's genesis.
It's genesis comes from the concept of central
planning by individuals who are self-interested
and also unprepared to solve all the problems.
www.YouTube.com/watch?v=7OQeSYgOars
I like to say, "all organisms (organizations) are self-protecting".
It's the "policeman's dilemma". The expected goal of a police-force is to reduce crime, however, if crime increases (more specifically if "the fear of crime" increases), the size and budget and power of the police-force INCREASES. If crime is actually reduced then staff and budgets are SLASHED.
This creates a perverse incentive.
The same principle applies to cancer research, or any other "problem" (primary mission) an organization is trying to "solve".
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find the critical logical errors and conflicts within the Holacracy Constitution,
Click to watch full analysis, especially the Q&A session,