Steemit Crypto Academy Contest / S16W4 [SUMMARY]: STEEM Ecosystem Resilience
Introduction
Dear Steemians,
We hope that your day is going well and that your week has been successful so far. We are pleased to present to you in detail the summary of the competition which took place from March 18 to 24, 2024, marking the fourth week of the sixteenth season of the Steemit Engagement Challenge. We would like to highlight the continued success of this event, made possible thanks to the exemplary professionalism of our academic team. Their significant contribution played a crucial role in the smooth running of this competition.
The main objective of this report is to offer you an in-depth analysis of the data and feedback we have collected during this period, with a particular focus on your dynamic participation in the community competition organized by the Steemit Crypto Academy. This competition was primarily intended to assess your knowledge in the general areas of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.
This week, the competition focused on the theme of the resilience of STEEM ecosystems. We encouraged participants to explore this topic in depth by carefully examining its characteristics and familiarizing themselves with the crucial aspects related to privacy within this specific blockchain.
As part of this competition, our esteemed participants were tasked with answering the following questions:
How has the STEEM ecosystem demonstrated its resilience to market fluctuations and changing trends over time?
How can the analysis of on-chain metrics, such as daily transactions, community participation and token distribution, provide insights into the health and robustness of the STEEM ecosystem?
How can STEEM's Relative Strength Analysis versus other cryptocurrencies help investors identify potential opportunities in varying market conditions? (Provide an example that shows your analysis)
What are the possible implications of fundamental events, such as STEEM protocol upgrades, on relative strength dynamics and market participants' perception of the ecosystem?
How does the integration of on-chain analysis with relative strength assessment provide a comprehensive perspective for investors seeking to understand the overall strength of the STEEM ecosystem and make informed decisions? (Provide an example that shows your analysis)
We are delighted with the exceptional quality of content presented in the submissions, showcasing the dedication and expertise of all participants. This edition notably saw the arrival of several newcomers to our cryptocurrency competitions, marking an important step in their immersion on our platform and in our community.
The diverse perspectives offered by these new members enriched the overall competition experience, highlighting the inclusive and welcoming nature of our engagement initiatives.
With the success of this competition, we look forward to discovering new talents in the coming seasons. The inclusion of new members has not only expanded our contributor base, but also highlighted the potential for growth and sustainability within our community.
Without further ado, let's dive into the statistical data and express our gratitude, highlighting the quantitative aspects of the competition while expressing our sincere appreciation to all participants for their valuable contributions.
Participation statistics
We received a total number of 18 submissions for the competition, demonstrating an acceptable level of engagement and interest from our community. Each submission represents an investment of time and effort on the part of participants, demonstrating their dedication to the competition and their desire to contribute to the STEEM ecosystem.
However, unfortunately, one of these submissions was deemed invalid due to content not relevant to our competition. This requirement was clearly specified in the competition guidelines, aimed at ensuring entrant eligibility and maintaining fairness in the selection process. In the absence of this status, the submission did not meet the established criteria, which led to its disqualification.
Maintaining high standards of compliance is essential to ensure the integrity and credibility of the competition. By applying the criteria fairly and consistently, we ensure a fair and transparent competition environment for all participants. While we regret having to disqualify a submission, it is imperative to enforce the established rules to preserve the integrity of the selection process.
However, this situation does not diminish the value of the other 17 valid submissions we received. Each contribution is valuable and plays an essential role in the richness and diversity of ideas expressed in the competition. We would like to express our gratitude to all participants for their commitment and contribution, and we look forward to continuing to see their active participation in future competitions and community events.
| Total number of entries | Invalid entry | Plagiarized content |
|---|---|---|
A thorough analysis of this week's performance revealed several important findings. In particular, four publications stood out by obtaining an excellent rating, representing a significant share of 22% of the total applications evaluated.
Regarding the ratings, the vast majority of participants, 61%, were rated as good quality reflecting the overall consistency of the contributions. However, 11% of participations were rated as acceptable, perhaps suggesting opportunities for improvement in some aspects.
A positive aspect is that no posts have been flagged for plagiarism due to the use of ChatGPT. This highlights the importance of upholding high ethical standards and promoting originality within our community.
In summary, this in-depth assessment provides a comprehensive view of participant performance, highlighting both the richness and diversity of contributions. Additionally, it draws attention to specific areas requiring attention, providing avenues for continued development. This information is valuable in promoting excellence and inclusion within our community.
Top 3 users of the week
In our evaluation process, we began by assessing the quality of participants' performances, paying particular attention to their interactions with other candidates.
When selecting the top 3 participants, we took into account both their performance scores and their engagement levels. Additionally, a separate consideration was made based on an article with exceptional content relevant to the topic of discussion. Below, you'll discover the top 3 users we've recognized for their outstanding contributions this week.
i have done
Thank you very much for mentioning me as one of the top 3 user of the week. Its a great pleasure for me. Congratulations for all the other winners @hamzayousafzai, @letssittt
Thank you so much entire Crypto academy Team and congratulations all the participants for giving the best shot.
Many many congratulations to all the winners here .I hope I will see my name here in winners list soon. I will work really hard for it. Congratulations once again guys.
Thank you so much
Thank you so much
Congratulations to all winners
keep going , good luck
Wow I must say it isn't easy atall