I understand your indignation—if you are a serious author. As I said before, if I am wrong in my impression, I am very sorry. But I will not keep it to myself. People often appear in this Community who publish massive amounts of AI-generated text (and vehemently deny it, of course). I suppose that's just part of life today. But that doesn't mean I have to accept it. As I said, I don't attach much importance to the tools themselves. It's my sense of language that's triggered, that's the problem. Simple language has long since ceased to be a hallmark of CHatGPT & Co. I'll never be absolutely certain about the authenticity of my counterpart, I'm aware of that too. But in my Community, we speak up when there are uncertainties. I want to keep things public because they are in the public interest.

Have I wrongly pigeonholed you? I would be sorry if I had. Really and truly. Nevertheless, I will continue to point it out to you when your style sounds like AI to me. I don't reject the technology in general, but in my opinion it has no place in the field of writing. I am aware of the estimated percentage of books published in 2025 that will be written entirely by AI, and it worries me greatly. I try to keep this space “clean.” I know I'm failing at that, too. Feel free to read the posts here from the last four weeks... But I'll keep trying.