You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Community Support Program by @visionaer3003 - Application / Bewerbung
Thanks @weisser-rabe for mentioning my club status, which should be 100 since I have never sent out a single STEEM from my wallet ever since I joined this site, but for paying contestants.
That's right, I organize contests on my own and now do it through my newly formed community as well.
I am sure our community, Dream Steem, @hive-107855, will be supported by @visionaer3003
Let me thank @o1eh and @bambuka for their unconditional support. Thank you, everyone! I look forward to supporting the deserving writers on the esteemed Steemit platform.
Club100 or club75 doesn't really matter (any more). Officially, you don't even need it for the community curators. Club5050 status is sufficient for participation in the challenges, and even the Steem Reps don't need a higher status.
Therefore, the status should not be overrated. From my point of view, it is more important that the basic idea of regular powerups is followed, as can be seen in your case. :-)
Ob es nun club100 oder club75 ist, spielt doch eigentlich gar keine Rolle (mehr). Offiziell braucht man das selbst für die Community Curators nicht mehr. Für die Teilnahme an den Challenges reicht der club5050-Status und selbst die Steem Reps brauchen keinen höheren Status.
Insofern sollte man den Status nicht überbewerten. Wichtig ist aus meiner Sicht vielmehr, dass der Grundgedanke des regelmäßigen Powerups befolgt wird, wie bei dir ersichtlich ist. :-)
You are right, but when I get booming votes it makes a difference.
According to rules a club 100 gets 50%, club 75 gets 40% and club 50 gets @30% of curators vote which makes a difference on rating as well as value of amount. Thanks for your kind visit and comment 👍
Yes, exactly. And that's where you see the real problem. These are rules made by the curators without having understood the meaning behind them.
So I hope - like weisser-rabe - for a rethink/development soon... Inertia does not only work in the physical sense ;-)
Ja, genau. Und daran erkennt man das eigentliche Problem. Das sind Regeln, die durch die Kuratoren gemacht wurden, ohne den Sinn dahinter verstanden zu haben.
Insofern hoffe ich - ähnlich wie weisser-rabe- auf baldiges Umdenken... Trägkeit wirkt nicht nur im physikalischen Sinne ;-)
TEAM 1
Congratulations! Your Comment has been upvoted through steemcurator04. We support good comments anywhere..Vielen Dank.
Auch dafür, dass ich dank dessen einen anderen, bisher nicht wahrgenommenen Kommentar zu diesem Beitrag gesehen habe... :-)
This is a significant point you raise: we have discussed in many places how the payment of winnings or transfers to other accounts etc. affect club status. So far, only charitable participations have been excluded from consideration. I don't think that's really fair either...
May be there will come any developement in the future.
TEAM 1
Congratulations! Your Comment has been upvoted through steemcurator04. We support good comments anywhere..Thank you Team and @stef I appreciate it 👍