RE: Witness and STEEMIT must solve the problem of abusing.
Don't try to use my own posts against me.
I'm allowed to argue opposite points.
It's called debate.
By freezing stake you are doing exactly the opposite of securing the chain. I also wrote a post about how Steem has missed more than 17k blocks since the Hive hardfork with 15 hours of downtime. You think this is securing the chain? Laughable.
Equating freezing the ninjamine to freezing multiple accounts that actually earned/bought their stake is a fool's errand.
This is not DPOS, this is one account controlling everything.
This is a Sybil attack disguised as decentralized consensus.
The network did not "come to consensus" to freeze those accounts.
All witnesses who did not agree with account freezing were immediately replaced.
How blind are you?
This is sad.
You are embarrassing yourself, and you don't even know it.
Were you listening to the Dude's story, Donny?
Were you listening to the Dude's story?
I was bowling.
So you have no frame of reference here, Donny. You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and wants to know...
Fully out of your element.
Just like Donny.
No one said the opposite. You just need to define your ground. Either you support freezing stake or don't. Only accepting it when X is doing it is a bit weird.
Run a node, and get your data straight. Because what you suggesting is pretty weird, people are throwing this
ninja minearound without really knowing for sure. Once you get things clear up, don't try to dodge the facts by saying that there was a social contract once you get the proof that a lot of people you are supporting have sweet candies in their stomachs.Pure DPOS = Your influence on the chain equals the amount of your stake and delegated stake. If you want more influence on the chain, you need to buy more stake and invest.
DPOS + Feelings = Even if you played by the rules and bought a lot of Steem, you should not be able to influence the chain because my feeling could get hurt.
Based on feelings or DPOS? Because things can change as I mentioned above.
If a witness does not reflect your vision, why should you keep voting for him?
TL:DR
last word.
When precision begins.
So long,