You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [STEEM] Hive 주요 멤버들의 어뷰징에 대응하기 위한 다운보팅 트레일에 팔로우를 부탁드립니다
Something to think about (longer term) - Identifying abusers is one thing, but convincing large numbers of people to start downvoting into near-certain retaliation is another.
I wrote about a potential mitigation for that problem a while ago, in "If you want Steem's minnows to use their downvotes, protect them with quorum sensing", but I probably don't have the means to implement it. It might be something you could build into SteemWorld.
Thanks for your input! You share some interesting thoughts in your post. I like the idea of having downvotes bound to kind of a community decision. Completely anonymous downvoting would be nearly impossible to implement, but needing a bunch of people to agree for executing a big downvote sounds not so bad.
Of course, there are various reasons for downvoting content and maybe we won't need it for normal content in future. The way the old witnesses have gone (for example, automatically downvoting people based on the used number of words in a post) clearly was not the best one.
I think we should mainly focus on real abuse, cases where someone posts 10 senseless comments a day and upvotes each of them 100% with a $5 vote. Of course, the same goes for trashy root posts. But I think we will never find a working measurement instrument for quality content, because people are just too different.
I completely agree with this.
So you want downvotes so you can use them against others but downvotes against you are bad?
Lol this place is such a shit show. There is no way you guys are keeping a straight face behind the computer screen
Don't you remember, they are trying to remove downvotes from Steem. In fact, the Korean @proxy.token account used removing downvotes as a type of extortion for them to give witness votes.
Really funny to see how drastic their ideals changed