You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [공지]Four-Party Dialogue Proposal (Steem foundation, Tron foundation, Steem witnesses, and Korean community)
Rather than having two people of the Korean community (Host and 1 Member) I believe there should be two witnesses of the previous top 20.
Those witnesses represent the entire community and not just a part of it since they were voted by most of the votes and stake.
Else, we would have to take a representative of the German, Brazilian, Spanish, etc communities too and I don't think that is fair.
I partly agree, but in the end only a few very big accounts (from which @freedom is completely unknown) decide which witnesses are on top.
Now, in respect of his available STEEM power, @justinsunsteemit is the 'new @freedom' and teaches us that there should be means (implemented into the code) to restrict the influence of single individuals, if we want STEEM to be decentralized.
I think that at least we should reduce the number of witness votes per account to lessen somewhat the huge influence of the biggest stake holders.
4 votes per account will solve these issues.
For example ...
4 votes instead of 30.
Yes, yes, I know what you wanted to say. I just think that four votes is one option among others.