You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: This is called the HIVE AirDrop Exclusion List. (HIVE 에어드랍 제외 대상 목록이라고 합니다.)
No one is freezing any funds on Hive.
And please Google meaning of the word "neutral".
Neutral would have been not voting at all. They were not neutral.
Voting for enough witnesses that neither side could istitute a hard fork is one of the most neutral things somebody could do.
No it is not. It's playing sides.
Not voting for anyone has the same effect if neutrality was the goal. It was not.
Not voting for anyone would have let the chain get taken over by who ever had the greater cash flow. Which probably would have been sun with the help of the exchanges
Again, thanks to votes from SCT and the rest of the korean community neither side could have made a move.
Witness votes are not a one shot deal so choosing to not vote is not the same as voting for both sides.
Trying to support both sides can also be counted as not taking sides; ergo basically neutral.
Helping maintain centralization on the chain is in no way neutral.
Helping to maintain centralization on the chain would be voting for 17+ tron witnesses. What they did is prevent either side from acting and tried to encourage conversation.
They did not encourage conversation. They made a list of demands.
What demands?