You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: This is called the HIVE AirDrop Exclusion List. (HIVE 에어드랍 제외 대상 목록이라고 합니다.)
In no way should anyone that voted for the sock puppets get a pass.
That is double the case for the Koreans.
They could have at any time removed the sock puppets from power.
They decided to ask for ransom instead of trying to bridge the gap between tron and us.
That's what I expected during the talks with Justin. Creating understanding due to their tie breaker position.
Instead they wanted to get payed and accepted bribes from Justin.
And now this post. I find them despicable and it has nothing to do with their race or nationality.. How dare they even insinuate such a thing.
Even if hardfork 0.22.2 freezes certain accounts, @proxy.token tried to stay neutral. @proxy.token voted on both sides.
@proxy.token tried to make a conversation with Tron and steem witnesses. You can look at SCT discord. Anybody can watch the conversation.
Why do you blame Korean and @proxy.token?
Hive will have a plan to freeze certain accounts that have different opinion from hive's opinion..
I am really disappointed.
No one is freezing any funds on Hive.
And please Google meaning of the word "neutral".
Neutral would have been not voting at all. They were not neutral.
Voting for enough witnesses that neither side could istitute a hard fork is one of the most neutral things somebody could do.
No it is not. It's playing sides.
Not voting for anyone has the same effect if neutrality was the goal. It was not.
Not voting for anyone would have let the chain get taken over by who ever had the greater cash flow. Which probably would have been sun with the help of the exchanges
Again, thanks to votes from SCT and the rest of the korean community neither side could have made a move.
Witness votes are not a one shot deal so choosing to not vote is not the same as voting for both sides.
Trying to support both sides can also be counted as not taking sides; ergo basically neutral.
Helping maintain centralization on the chain is in no way neutral.
Helping to maintain centralization on the chain would be voting for 17+ tron witnesses. What they did is prevent either side from acting and tried to encourage conversation.
They did not encourage conversation. They made a list of demands.
What demands?
Source?
Go to their discord and search for the talks between witnesses and Justin.
Or simply search through Ausbitbank posts and find the video.
Why should I have to sift through discord chat logs? If what you said is true then surely someone has made a post about it with the relevant information.
There's a post on my blog.
https://steemit.com/sct/@lordbutterfly/unfortunately-the-korean-justin-discussion-was-a-complete-waste-of-time
This one? Because I am still not seeing any kind of evidence except for you saying something happened. And I really don't feel like going on a hunt for something that may not even exist.
https://steemit.com/steemhostiletakeover/@ausbitbank/meeting-between-justin-sun-korean-stakeholders-steem-witnesses-and-steem-foundation-12-03-2020
Exactly @lordbutterfly good riddance to them. I remember that giant extortion letter full of demands from the community. Now they want to cry about the airdrop exclusion , cry racist, censorship blah blah blah.
I say WELCOME TO THE CONSEQUENCE OF YOU OWN FUCKING ACTIONS
The demand, as I understood it, was for a 3-day power down. Well, they have control of the steem blockchain now and the power down still takes 13 weeks. I wonder why that is? Could it be that a great many people have started a power down?
The above is a rhetorical question. I guess they realized the reasoning why a 3-day powerdown was anathema to the former STEEM witnesses.